Delivery-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 05:34:45 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04B701E03F7;
	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 05:34:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC0D37679;
	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:34:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C752537650
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:34:36 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id UPBsDQjZ35it for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:34:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com (mail-io0-f176.google.com
 [209.85.223.176])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2A8537600
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:34:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by ioiz6 with SMTP id z6so15650102ioi.2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=ucVTTjlEPU7kK40m+rmwwbBmXGvQsEZ4N5Q5mab0y0Y=;
 b=SnaYgxlvsTKWyVQJsulMErL133aCo/Gi5Lina10E4Mux03Z+ddsCKAH2jxumO1IrB8
 0AD/kGbTlsfd56lmSw1v4jkINTZs3HLYeL+4PXXl8iqYoaYYi+cGDy+P+DpT7XWKqJm2
 JVBsMn0aBnVh6E+malAvk4cH8XJfUtQRTPwtFvTsjZsoRx+NiqEMc1ZiNrBJCwXVcfo/
 iFZ8vZDnzCsrOa+z88iGoo54DoPT2PAF8x9VKAbE5Tcl0suTnC5mLl2srcT0cR9kSFpw
 nevGjwGLVdQCgNH2Fhk9kDjX8lGj9EZwlcfsdgWx+RHdBBY98MFATIc8MGyeH50EukS2
 qLIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkykmbkQTIG0lvsJ+FH6qtJ6OkSgJ4f86Z9RZUZAoFVx72aEAaW4yG4DZh/j/Oo3Ob1CjA/
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.107.169.145 with SMTP id f17mr4310235ioj.104.1442482474277; 
 Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.137.65 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Sep 2015 02:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Originating-IP: [2a01:348:18e:2:28d2:4444:457a:1]
In-Reply-To: <55FA859F.3080206@gmail.com>
References: <55FA859F.3080206@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 10:34:34 +0100
Message-ID: <CAM8M=kjtoithFFUwM3MXZO_14XOSZr6os5750UtXoe+C9aatVw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gareth Llewellyn <gareth@networksaremadeofstring.co.uk>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] WAF on TOR exit node
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

If a nodes exit policy specifies that port 80 is allowed then port 80
should be allowed without hindrance.

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Andrej Manduch <amanduch@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> Recently I had lot of problems with my ISP/VPS provider because my TOR
> exit node. I was thinking about setting up some basic WAF so tor exit
> node wont be marked by honeypots as hacker/badIP.
> Personally I don't care about IP but I'm not the one who will be living
> with that IP whole life. I got contract for that IP just for one year.
> So I understand why is ISP so emotional about it.
>
> My question is: What tor community thinks about setting up Web
> Application Firewall on tor exit node, and rejecting (therefore
> tampering with) some traffic.
>
> The second option for me is disable whole http/https but that's
> something I really don't want to do because I belive that most of
> legitimate traffic is from there.
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> b.
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

