Delivery-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 01:11:09 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C318E1E13D1;
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 01:11:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA19736CA5;
	Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:11:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E91364E0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:10:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id XOUIMbSd0xul for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:10:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from continuum.iocl.org (continuum.iocl.org [217.140.74.2])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AECAF35FA3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 05:10:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (from krey@localhost)
 by continuum.iocl.org (8.11.3/8.9.3) id t8U5Alh02801;
 Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:10:47 +0200
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 07:10:46 +0200
From: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20150930051046.GE24119@inner.h.apk.li>
References: <CAJwFvsWDxzLjhRLPa1xbW5EuXO1nw=BRR+uJTSqRxyu3BF9CYA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJwFvsXHjUWz8YwB70V3mfTrh9F=GwSCxpensEjEhLmBy-tjhQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJwFvsWSyJB7c0=dL22KuVSgJazBFdPpBqS6U3TJO5hHetd3Ew@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJwFvsWSyJB7c0=dL22KuVSgJazBFdPpBqS6U3TJO5hHetd3Ew@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-message-flag: What did you expect to see here?
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] How to write program that uses Tor network
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 23:22:37 +0000, Tyler Hardin wrote:
> Also, about rate limiting, what sort of rate limit do y'all think would be
> mindful of the health of the network and the average site? I'm thinking a
> maximum of 1 req per second per site and 10 reqs per second overall

Perhaps you should go instead for number of simultaneous outstanding
requests - that self-scales much better. Firing new requests while
you already have lots of unanswered ones isn't good.

Andreas

-- 
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

