Delivery-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 21:56:28 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E020D1E0E9E;
	Thu,  4 Sep 2014 21:56:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB4A28AE1;
	Fri,  5 Sep 2014 01:56:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB06F288D1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  5 Sep 2014 01:56:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id gv9JxU_tm3kA for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri,  5 Sep 2014 01:56:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22b.google.com (mail-vc0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB71D25B25
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  5 Sep 2014 01:56:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id id10so11709388vcb.30
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=C0u3PTGe9HNmBcjIqAzfemJ+JrycXFDLNasjg1eV6JI=;
 b=uQfq86Xd2J2XVg/WPOQjw3TF5YbMY/fi02ENulPIBj/4PLZpWlTkaTNGReCEZHSxnc
 feTPSP+AxMx8QHCzaiMx13sKbCfz0rxm0DpR1GzndFS8t1OdU/sseK7/HfzOyz1ynoDQ
 pJ2JCr2yAQgVUvFGSk4YzmtZBiG2lC6Uwlx6T8K5wrBLNly8fN8JJMdop6EK+KCVfZQ3
 v5VtHPYmtvVU6hr6AG17lBGiySh9kg1+cMh1OdRxOTRhqBAjOHWP+wtGhbeXoG70F0L/
 wBCt14w6HM3fM5xh/giQAIbXm0LROblttJa5ig2q7kl8DWU8xHPsXLw10JyaDOr9fsxA
 86CQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.221.5.137 with SMTP id og9mr7870871vcb.18.1409882176460;
 Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.221.64.74 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 18:56:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5408E9AA.9050506@torservers.net>
References: <CADop2NGjDi3x-hKxRC7wBAWu5cYWzkHe+hg703UuxkPiSC2X=A@mail.gmail.com>
 <5408D678.7070305@torservers.net>
 <CADop2NH=G+FNJ8H+B-ok79EhfPVCPRUxB6BbrZwj8-8KXQB2Ng@mail.gmail.com>
 <5408E9AA.9050506@torservers.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 21:56:16 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti2_OvpFyHcLJL0t3bSvAvH=S0F35_KG8fkJ4Pksw9odVoQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tentative results of analysis of data on
	metrics.torproject.org
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:37 PM, Moritz Bartl <moritz@torservers.net> wrote:
> I would still be quite interested in a (pie?) chart that shows
> guard/middle/exit capacity per family, ideally over time. I haven't seen
> any "per family" analysis.

I like to see something that removes exit bandwidth in a way to show
available non-exit core capacity. Such for internal onion applications.
I do not have time to make such research. It may also require
additional metering stats from the nodes.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

