Delivery-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 18:09:32 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AA521E0E23;
	Thu,  4 Sep 2014 18:09:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85358259F5;
	Thu,  4 Sep 2014 22:09:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB35924FED
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  4 Sep 2014 22:09:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 63Zqpyw0h4ib for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu,  4 Sep 2014 22:09:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com (mail-ie0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4B9D24BE3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  4 Sep 2014 22:09:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id y20so12672370ier.20
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virgil.gr; s=dkim;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-type; bh=5t2zOVJsNfuYbGfr3CAMuog2X/wSF9apyGAbIx5Tq2M=;
 b=KIeYubZOnAQIiwAOubTbznAWIOLavPTx9KgOwcd3yiEIfLPkk3+3zZbxEgH6vJVXuM
 c8ZrnoSlRy0uistGWj4KewEDXZjWIPse5ad9OT3H4Nv63BMm9utJgkKldIm8cbLZwNZB
 DoQXmL3876FviIdDMlHG6UEsRM11KiF1RTDrA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
 bh=5t2zOVJsNfuYbGfr3CAMuog2X/wSF9apyGAbIx5Tq2M=;
 b=IWNMyHS8KJ7/G6+XiZFzZZy1TJ8jHF1ZZSfPVXjj9AFWIEeM5Jy083g8TM28kfeS1u
 xtPtfD/ZGwelbp5AG+SuHDqjhd+C+c1zxnbaEGdCJ3e2k8tazAQdUwIadxNeZgyyhGH5
 8yjOWDLlyzVRpmumCECN3/qjRdzcZ24kx0C8F8diUyCw7MtrFfwGR2i+aNknSmfHv89Y
 Ra700Nj4YxFsrQ0yXxI0oLSDH87xne1jsEZ0o7YVjZwQFSw7cFRSbUSQFhrEK4x24F2d
 Mvsm3XpbpH8Nrj6Wl3PYpGIDtXQB7JBJ6y9phGlWoGJuAHfe2eKumYGLsqO7vFyedRmR
 kj0g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmdhJsGk0eKREe0salVwH2Ikhdb46xsuNxRBiMyxq9d8OxK1TCysEn9AaWt2H68NmAPIFsq
X-Received: by 10.50.43.164 with SMTP id x4mr11459825igl.27.1409868560037;
 Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:09:20 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.22.99 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:08:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5408D678.7070305@torservers.net>
References: <CADop2NGjDi3x-hKxRC7wBAWu5cYWzkHe+hg703UuxkPiSC2X=A@mail.gmail.com>
 <5408D678.7070305@torservers.net>
From: Virgil Griffith <i@virgil.gr>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2014 15:08:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CADop2NH=G+FNJ8H+B-ok79EhfPVCPRUxB6BbrZwj8-8KXQB2Ng@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tor-talk@lists.torproject.org" <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tentative results of analysis of data on
	metrics.torproject.org
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

If that ascent is due to you, this screams to the success of the
torservers.net model.  It might be useful to see that plot without
Torservers.net in there.  If I figure out how to make sense of the raw
consensus file I may plot it.

-V

On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Moritz Bartl <moritz@torservers.net> wrote:

> Hi Virgil,
>
> Thanks for this.
>
> Tor relay bandwidth graph:
>
> https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/HpzpDU0wLZn87gcqL0-8w0b_ov1npXk_Bjgan-umAimBJjL0fKJpL_GbkSYRSdiHd764OqcvLYlWD_dICKztSoYMebNylnBr8brAOLxal4jsbausU0GJnMatp_g
>
> Did you know mid-2010 was when I started torservers.net? :)
>
> --
> Moritz Bartl
> https://www.torservers.net/
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

