Delivery-Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 06:03:06 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2F7D1E0430;
	Mon, 22 Sep 2014 06:03:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF342ADC9;
	Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:02:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4B120F0A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:02:54 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id q8ArQIst44QB for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:02:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-x234.google.com (mail-ig0-x234.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::234])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B89B2FDEE
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 10:02:53 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-ig0-f180.google.com with SMTP id a13so2385825igq.1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 03:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virgil.gr; s=dkim;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=F3+RgMT6vCJJ5uaIKX4wAbFSYJjoyKEqU+pgTN5SuLA=;
 b=IrNrPRutpmXLsdKfdbs4sz/69+lCYqu17Jo8uxgRB6HW75WqKufrcgemqh7NzuCk8S
 9jyvh+Xu2OtVqEYN4i825bTkOKH4YAZBFKqMesVpjz6LuhRVGj72dghTC4tYO7NGJqbv
 J/HjXFnKyZ+1+6tcmOV+6cbZijF8v87OE/aHY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=F3+RgMT6vCJJ5uaIKX4wAbFSYJjoyKEqU+pgTN5SuLA=;
 b=ex1i6SG1hXKYzvSMfIVE6HvY1eStuoGsAeadZ1A07NXGSJ3vqM4XOGoEJ0UznyeQvP
 YYNmAQLh6Ei9JitMGwy3ltVxihxA6gQhhaZNJdaOsT23FnZF01YbAckP7JGI4dZNWtEu
 FsGDZBmRKIrgz+3sf5NCZmn3du1zUSGF1/L4SFQfkVqxb5LHnQAcg2SIwA6y0VivLX/v
 wNED6qxyG6TZzyqBOAf/GGY/xhwi1Q2IQf0pA4gRO2oQh9QIKjrsmQSEA5VwQ4cokvZn
 eHjUSRaDtZbklmO3AV2xAo+Ax3RyKTiX4qtizTKxO80hL0EgZ6sNEZ59tW61mWXKXQUG
 g+rA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQndFApKPYGKxsFi6J880AyZnSnXRPXe6sbDzNEFbDFLEhZJR53nmtRht1+6dID9uqdcuAnA
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.66.229 with SMTP id i5mr13379565igt.27.1411380171525;
 Mon, 22 Sep 2014 03:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.22.99 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Sep 2014 03:02:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140922192903.7a2d901c@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20140922192903.7a2d901c@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2014 03:02:51 -0700
Message-ID: <CADop2NG7PhNHvmn=PHmTXbTK4YfAka85bxGGg3RkaChFXyN8dg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Virgil Griffith <i@virgil.gr>
To: "tor-talk@lists.torproject.org" <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Article: Best Alternatives to Tor
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Articles like these are irresponsible.  But at least the journalist did
sufficient homework to find a few "alternatives" I hadn't heard of.

-V

On Monday, September 22, 2014, Katya Titov <kattitov@yandex.com> wrote:

> Article named "Best Alternatives to Tor: 12 Programs to Use Since NSA,
> Hackers Compromised Tor Project":
>
>
> http://www.idigitaltimes.com/best-alternatives-tor-12-programs-use-nsa-hackers-compromised-tor-project-376976
>
> Some quotes:
>
> "Tor has been compromised, the Tor Project has recently suffered from
> two security setbacks which have called into question just how safe
> users on the anonymity service are."
>
> "In any case, it's best to assume that Tor has been compromised by the
> NSA, DHS, FBI and pretty much any other government intelligence agency,
> domestic and foreign."
> --
> kat
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org <javascript:;>
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

