Delivery-Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:31:15 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9F751E0A95;
	Thu, 18 Sep 2014 14:31:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA0D24965;
	Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:31:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A00243F1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:31:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id tRWuXbmZvq9w for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:31:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-x22f.google.com (mail-qa0-x22f.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22f])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0A9124361
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 18:31:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id cm18so1546612qab.34
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=WxtH1X6fa6nqD7tDS5mwQToRA52f6GQakvfcilhpT5Y=;
 b=YNy4YF05C7avr4zhSUEI2VHyyzu87h7na6Z3aPX9pUW7gkmK+N9ulCqkC1tU0C1RHX
 X5YRn+W86B36Vh9CfbYoUqie0eXnwp+Z3t5QnYh9p7/DSy52stcNRgoG+0JVsRQW4Zub
 0lnKn7rsQo4VbTVgwz503+9+Qo0dQ+bWTDvr8YkuvI8+1goeutYE1v1OFSjm41BgNEJF
 0M3mT8UrwzR+4xEWbj+iPcl+THo9HgROgJG+670udDXK5ZyZnP0Tu5GKFEU4BXPBd1gL
 f22e7mK9KvqDyIo9fOt0LInUMZ1XBdi6aLD+cOnbH7S5j0IP2CKTvF6/E+16f+yeof7u
 lXcQ==
X-Received: by 10.224.120.138 with SMTP id d10mr12198928qar.8.1411065064313;
 Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:31:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (host203.201-252-61.telecom.net.ar. [201.252.61.203])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 c8sm7672781qge.33.2014.09.18.11.31.02
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:31:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <541b24e7.085d8c0a.884d.ffffa1ca@mx.google.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2014 15:30:59 -0300
From: Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <1411049743.21331.2.camel@anglachel>
References: <156b8eed2e9dc784c15c238afc028330.squirrel@bitmailendavkbec.onion>
 <CAD2Ti29evbkQ5vRJxkEbx=L+hKypUsVdZY7aFuCkktXU=xMpsA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1410994840.10492.7.camel@anglachel>
 <CAD2Ti2_5kbPgaBQq2YG2SB8mKp3w_oAdjU0_cGtdB4UtHbCYrw@mail.gmail.com>
 <1411049743.21331.2.camel@anglachel>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.10; i486-slitaz-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] wake up tor devs
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>


> > The real question is: with Freenet, I2P, Gnunet, CJDNS,
> > Phantom, Tor, etc... afaik all seemingly 'pretty good' and not
> > broken... *why* are their adoption shares ranked however
> > they are?
> 
> I think it's because they're all either abandoned, noticeably
> insecure, or in their infancy. Tor is the only one with an active
> developer community, a strong basis in research, and a proven track
> record of security.
> 
> Sometimes questions just have simple answers.


	So freenet is 'abandoned'? 'noticeably insecure'? or in 'its
	infancy'?

	I eagerly await some serious information here. 

	Plus your idea that tor works because allegedly there
	are no NSA documents saying otherwise is a joke. 

	"Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence"









-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

