Delivery-Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:37:50 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEA151E0100;
	Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:37:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B782CF7F;
	Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:37:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900962B173
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:37:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id bo0ia7Y37CT5 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:37:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-x229.google.com (mail-vc0-x229.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::229])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D6C223F37
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 22:37:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id ij19so27442vcb.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=oNQjCgRvj5avPQEFwicPlzPwG7e411rWCdcXP7igVCQ=;
 b=XfcfPEnXGD2FWw4cxzNLmSjZhVbeb8KnMSdeUdnMkakdM/pNd0PSZB3TcIFgLVLbCx
 I/HaoxRlGla4nUSa0QtKtfkhsN8p3ElhuCVI0zxnFnh5wGSXjx2bYGqi+SVclf7fQMrV
 ytFQF+rBVYFwqyGUvA8wWkP1DzVoeKraM4yc3oMqXnEemjCzo1xYyQIDTBPgT+4HBZ2m
 B8d483TN4LL9veKhjHq/4VedJ8diivMZxmQXJSULeH25+Vl557ywdskfktQR3A3bHtD7
 F7GnelbE45MGpZNFlxN1p0uUH9T02hSN64KGYMxh7csqI/9Ejq4CHQLEkZpP4aE23vCU
 IUBg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.52.136 with SMTP id t8mr172013vdo.21.1410993457076; Wed,
 17 Sep 2014 15:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.221.64.74 with HTTP; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 15:37:37 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20140915211606.GB4565@torproject.org>
References: <541739B5.4070103@gmx.com> <20140915224224.71bed7bf@meilong>
 <20140915211606.GB4565@torproject.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 18:37:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti28Uab-Ed7hRwijL_YNYB2rFcB3NvWZ6+xheUrO7dDHVwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] more sites requiring captchas from Cloudfare (using
 Google API?)
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Mike Perry <mikeperry@torproject.org> wrote:
> I think pushback
> from actual CloudFlare customers will carry far more weight

Via Tor, I tried to buy some stuff (Stuff) through a shop (Newegg)
that clears its transactions (Bitcoin) through a processor (Bitpay)
with which it contracts. Said processor contracts with a website
protector (Cloudflare). I entered the correct captcha (my
undistinguishable rate over this was about 50%) to each
captcha Cloudflare presented via the Newegg Bitpay embed. After
about 20 tries including some complete new sessions and newnyms
and wasting two hours of my time never once passing and being given
the BTC address to pay, I gave up and went to my local retailer.

Insofar as we are their customers (our purchases are the
source of funds for Cloudflare through this contractual chain), they
lost a sale. Is that due to Tor? I cannot say. But I can say it's dumb.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

