Delivery-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:10:33 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,
	UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 502561E086F;
	Tue, 16 Sep 2014 23:10:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1FF02F5B7;
	Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:10:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A952F585
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:10:19 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id p1JNJJbtZAHf for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:10:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from WM50.inbox.com (wm50.inbox.com [64.135.83.50])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB23B2D6EB
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 03:10:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from inbox.com (127.0.0.1:25)
 by inbox.com with [InBox.Com SMTP Server]
 id <1409161910021.WM50> for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org> from
 <beatthebastards@inbox.com>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:10:17 -0800
DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=inbox.com; s=s1;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:from:subject:to:content-type;
 b=jtN4QH2IFgc30YXuPKsOAr40rL8LqU0itDJRY1ALAygJUaizSts2qXGSxPtcHiAWZcDN
 JBPjm5IG257UJql35K4GvO1ljm1RSqZlVYrUXdIZ3cJA+Jr0HsGNQP3gr+NRgT+PtOsdcO
 I4FgaQVEAysGviIcNDlfYsfSGqEDoYSMQ=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt;
 d=inbox.com; s=s1;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=V/oAy1rLkxnnHt5zimF03+lGadYhcAne2tYOPCL2FRs=;
 b=By5/6rf+vG1QWPcncPfKQCcNwN7SBxDEc7UECE5LqjrLmph8Za5dPWoCifbZ42JQbehQ
 ls5xmCZv08Bc23HKKezYzzV6GDGQrXnguEd+EDrZ2AxO0RbJqMRm2cdMfDZFR9Mf+z0ljz
 HwqD+vUdrcebStLTpsfGQWaeJ9k8oyAfU=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:10:17 -0800
Message-ID: <FF8FCA67538.00000A41beatthebastards@inbox.com>
From: I <beatthebastards@inbox.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <5418F229.80307@torservers.net>
References: <5417bd06.5020009@danielroskams.com>
 <f9e4072be0a.000002a4beatthebastards@inbox.com>
 <54180d45.8070501@danielroskams.com> <5417f6aa.5030500@sky-ip.org>
X-Mailer: INBOX.COM
X-Originating-IP: 14.200.2.184
X-IWM-ACU: QCFFQwW0F_bCCDH4oAHuC_qCbwdKDEojO6ZoJs03aiFkZzfyhtWgHmoyylwC
 it1Xr75cPkS0M4EW9YQdd429pmhf5VmSrfrcuhWtzmzDTChn3Vtih2QHPHrJ
 a4EVo14oRMObDrmCxJZ6L4fT1
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor relay on home computer
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Your point is valid.
I didn't realise that it was established that the replies were entirely pointless.

Aren't there any real copyright threats?


Robert


> On 09/16/2014 06:20 PM, I wrote:
>> The RISK OF COPYRIGHT THREATS is specifically greatest
>> in USA. Other nations should be assessed individually.
>> Fearmongering is not productive.
> 
> I call it DMCA spam. Spam sent by a botnet: They scrape IPs from torrent
> trackers and send out unsolicited email. Their reply-to address is a
> blackhole. Even after you explain why you're legally not responsible for
> Tor traffic, they keep sending those emails. I don't see any legal
> responsibility to react to every single one of them after a couple. Some
> of our larger ISPs tried to approach them as well, and then as final
> step blackholed the spam.
> 
> The legal situation is pretty much the same in all Western countries.
> --


-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

