Delivery-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:17:00 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,
	UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A76D61E0A68;
	Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:16:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E26132EEE0;
	Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:16:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB91F2EE2C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:16:47 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id zqk4vTwR9sbL for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:16:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from WM50.inbox.com (wm50.inbox.com [64.135.83.50])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B78AF2ED72
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:16:47 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from inbox.com (127.0.0.1:25)
 by inbox.com with [InBox.Com SMTP Server]
 id <1409161816054.WM50> for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org> from
 <beatthebastards@inbox.com>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:16:44 -0800
DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=inbox.com; s=s1;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:from:subject:to:content-type;
 b=k1427hcHse6PUntB4gxVNgIwLI2dpbCFql6zXn11iaeS1fbzlTZhGwJtnU80mJUzqIcs
 IfMcVG7yK1oJGt6J9ArNojuJtALLkhJAMYeS+R6hZ/j+uCwiM1t9CpSy4I15qCNttPhMaB
 6MdATIIz4tuyX/C3cgXyj0WmsWrHEQrF4=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt;
 d=inbox.com; s=s1;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=swLkkenhRYDkmoosnp9EA1pSjjPCOGuli2kjHBtVBng=;
 b=mMncqNxVM5uu5HUrYdf8Ckq7FdZsUgpA2/vlQVpHShRC6nzJN1QB8tbNOa1VPgs/0VUG
 oKZhQaHXXZcUVBmYrAqqbEBDSqxafgfCkrpVfsnlM37wsxt9S4KRPWBIpp9Ghw67yZIPhw
 /7btDYDy9hMvCk8ETKITHq9AnHxULbLwI=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 18:16:43 -0800
Message-ID: <FF180F89F32.000009B3beatthebastards@inbox.com>
From: I <beatthebastards@inbox.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <541867C4.1050600@riseup.net>
References: <5417bd06.5020009@danielroskams.com>
 <f9e4072be0a.000002a4beatthebastards@inbox.com>
 <54180d45.8070501@danielroskams.com> <5417f6aa.5030500@sky-ip.org>
X-Mailer: INBOX.COM
X-Originating-IP: 14.200.2.184
X-IWM-ACU: 0emspVoOOkpHD6N5Kt_KbkXmJMtvwIBvPsuT3W3aM5bufdtzHX5u9jBWELRD
 tS8UCUU_0bH61M_lZe7s96TSQC2nVcYM8X_NWy_X8O7RWw1irSHzEjWoF-JK
 2abY3h4fg_v7IFssoVPuXnqfY
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor relay on home computer
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Fair enough sort of.

When I encountered this list and the general references to Tor around the place there was far too much rumourmongering about exits and Tor in general scaring people away.

It is reasonable to be cautious but if everyone talks in general terms of fear and mayhem it is working against Tor and one wonders whether ISPs are some of those influenced by such unfounded stuff.

It should be perfectly normal and reasonable to run Tor relays.
It should be what every sensible person might consider.

Good on you for running a huge Tor cluster.
May there be many more like you.

Robert

> 
> Clearly you have not been to the UK. Under US law that is known, it is
> perfectly fine to run a relay both middle and exit, the same cannot be
> said here in the UK unfortunately and I don't think this is at all
> fear-mongering.
> 
> Having experienced more than my fair share of attacks from law
> enforcement for running a huge Tor cluster from here in the UK, I can
> say with great confidence people should be told what the risk is because
> I doubt very much I am the only one who have experienced them, yet I may
> be one of the few who speak out against them.
> 
> On 16/09/2014 17:20, I wrote:
>> The RISK OF COPYRIGHT THREATS is specifically greatest in USA. Other
>> nations should be assessed individually.
>> 
>> Fearmongering is not productive.
>> 
>> Robert
> 
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

