Delivery-Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:03:43 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E1A91E0B98;
	Tue, 16 Sep 2014 17:03:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F75244AD;
	Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:03:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3329D241D9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:03:35 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id SeIoNJDMoHuv for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:03:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3EC52419F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 21:03:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from berryeater.riseup.net (berryeater-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.120])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4092953E81
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2014 14:03:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1410901412; bh=mvAgfGnlfIjup0YhJ0RvHY/EtPV6UPP3w2t7nz9VKkE=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=Oi8+Ic7s06CEAXzNRkKj846kwi1fv/4WkwgJS7Xo7zJ8/6CHWaVBcQrj657WDPdPy
 KL2crXy1bEDi/F7ynluTC103FHOSyRl3qv8xam8u1EuKomPpSHci4JrN8roIlSOcrJ
 ehDE2HCralxZN3xzQEv9lk+OsmGMp78yN75DzVzI=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: thomaswhite) with ESMTPSA id 42BD9430C5
Message-ID: <5418A597.1030901@riseup.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:03:19 +0100
From: Thomas White <thomaswhite@riseup.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <20140916205533.GL32501@badger>
In-Reply-To: <20140916205533.GL32501@badger>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Don't use sectoor
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Note: I have excluded sectoor.de from this message

Public shaming of companies does work, there is a good/bad ISP list
below which can always be subtlely mentioned when communicating with ISPs:

https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs

However, I think it is a step in the wrong direction to start publicly
bring a support email into the public domain without discussing it
privately first. In addition, you didn't link this "public
information" part in your email to them. The problem of ISPs usually
is not that they don't like Tor, but most of the time they simply
don't understand it and approaching like this is not going to change
that. Instead, if this were me (and I have dealt with many, many
companies in the past) I would approach asking if they would consider
allowing Tor on the basis you could perhaps reach an agreement over
handling abuse issues for example. If that didn't work, even asking if
they would accept non-exits instead is at least a step in the right
direction.

If they don't move from their position, then it is always open to ask
tor-talk for assistance in convincing them or perhaps ask for advice
on what arguments you can use in persuading them. I have even offered
in the past (and this offer remains open btw) to assist in talking to
ISPs to change their policy. Some methods work, some don't, but
turning this into a you vs us scenario with an ISP won't work because
ultimately they don't give a shit about one customer unless that one
customer is bringing large amounts of revenue.

Regards,
- -T

On 16/09/2014 21:55, obx wrote:
> Dear tor-talk, Dear sectoor,
> 
> I'm running a tor-exit at a small provider. Another customer at the
> same provider complained they got blacklisted by sectoor for
> operating a tor-exit. This customer doesn't run a tor server and
> didn't run a tor server in the past.
> 
> Hence, they got blacklisted as tor-exit.
> 
> I did some lookups and it looks like you banned the whole class C.
> 
> Why?
> 
> There's no need to "guess" since the list of tor exits is public 
> information.
> 
> Please understand that is level of irresponsible management on
> your site, sectoor, can destroy the reputation of smaller
> providers.
> 
> I expect you fix this instantly.
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
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=o3xP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

