Delivery-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 05:22:38 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C9101E0A4F;
	Sun, 14 Sep 2014 05:22:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1F63085F;
	Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:22:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0574F3075E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:22:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 9wlvQ8Sa_P2u for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:22:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4D002D783
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 09:22:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from berryeater.riseup.net (berryeater-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.120])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DBFE53A3F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2014 02:22:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1410686545; bh=7UmpHs6NTKQOH+LTPpW2gLL51ZhvgcChghI9pl5uDJ0=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=mpoQF5b0Pgm/xDt9botfBxPi+0QqMVIA0rMtiBoVzxS+iT8M/hdOOuNanDyr2pBxP
 q5f7kjjvaKQrftDx4j9s30hulS6ZOliyrQFFFTkVrTAtE+GP6njNR58Ss2uQhjqbHg
 r1JzP7qWvsM3wHZX4v8HBfQSYhmvCAKFo3wJaUM4=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: mirimir) with ESMTPSA id 60AB740152
Message-ID: <54155E4C.6090509@riseup.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 03:22:20 -0600
From: Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <5414C6CC.9040002@virtadpt.net>
 <20140913224225.GD36318@moria.seul.org> <5414E2AC.6060808@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <5414E2AC.6060808@gmail.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Comcast looking for Tor traffic,
 contacting customers to threaten termination of service.
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 09/13/2014 06:34 PM, Rick wrote:
> On 09/13/2014 06:42 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 03:35:56PM -0700, The Doctor wrote:
>>> "Reports have surfaced that Comcast agents have contacted
>>> customers using Tor and instructed them to stop using the browser
>>> or risk termination of service. A Comcast agent named Jeremy
>>> allegedly called Tor an ???illegal service.??? The Comcast agent
>>> told its customer that such activity is against usage policies."
>>> 
>>> http://www.deepdotweb.com/2014/09/13/comcast-declares-war-tor/
>>> 
>>> Think I'm going to ping my lawyer about this.
>> This article confuses me.
>> 
>> For example, it has this statement: "Because Tor Browser provides
>> online anonymity to its users, only the ISP used along with it can
>> ascertain what activity takes place on Tor." which sure makes it
>> sound like the author thinks that the local ISP can learn what
>> destinations you are visiting, which isn't (supposed to be) true.
>> 
>> And then this statement: "Comcast has previously been blacklisted
>> by the Tor project." sounds like maybe it's referring to 
>> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs which
>> a) has to do with recommended relay locations, and b) isn't really
>> "the Tor Project", but I can understand how they'd be confused.
>> 
>> That said, I guess part of the confusion here stems from a lack of 
>> transparency on Comcast's side, about what guidance they're giving
>> their first-level helpdesk people. Is this two rogue underpaid
>> undereducated employees who read an article about Tor and decided
>> it should stop existing? Or is there some document that Comcast
>> wrote? If the latter, can somebody get us a copy of it?
>> 
>> Thanks, --Roger
>> 
> If you factor the PinkMeth post here (earlier this week) into this
> it might make more sense. It's a firestorm and the locals want a head
> on a pike. The company is outside of Pittsburgh and owned by the
> girl's mother. Comcast is based in PA and effectively "family owned".
> Perhaps the mysterious "Jeremy" is on a mission from a higher power
> that's looking for any reason at all to bust your chops. 
> Circumstantial evidence at this point but I think this just might be 
> vendetta-fueled.
> 
> Happy trails. Rick

From the comments in JM's page on PinkMeth, it appears that virtually
everyone associated with her and her family has been deluged with abuse.
Also, some of the abusers have reportedly emphasized PinkMeth's supposed
invulnerability as a Tor hidden service, and also their own supposed
invulnerability as Tor users.

Given that, it is plausible that a vendetta against Tor is developing at
Comcast. But there is as yet no evidence whether its just a few rogue
employees in support, or whether it could become company policy.

However, even in the worst case, Comcast would be less of a threat to
its Tor users than the Great Firewall is to Chinese Tor users. There are
no laws in the US against using Tor. Users can just connect to the Tor
network through obfuscated bridges.

Users could also use a VPN service to hide all Internet use from
Comcast, and connect to the Tor network (perhaps via obfuscated bridges)
through the VPN tunnel. In this case, a non-US VPN service would
arguably represent less of a threat than Comcast does.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

