Delivery-Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:15:21 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16AE61E0A78;
	Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:15:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312692E5A4;
	Sat, 13 Sep 2014 17:15:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 558BD2DBF0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 17:15:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id bf9UvaTJTj95 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 13 Sep 2014 17:15:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.ncf.ca (mail.ncf.ca [206.47.12.45])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37B282CCFA
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 17:15:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.ncf.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.ncf.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D559F660
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:15:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (d24-156-234-120.home4.cgocable.net
 [24.156.234.120])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fq743)
 by mail.ncf.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B3D2F9F490
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:15:10 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <54147B86.7050707@ncf.ca>
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2014 13:14:46 -0400
From: stn <stn@ncf.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <54134ecb.2080301@infosecurity.ch>
 <cajvra1trtzhbdopjs8gs94oe04=6si=5anx=94amggxybyr_nq@mail.gmail.com>
 <20140911101248.4c48c290c1@scatolo>
 <CD975485BA2.0000073Cbeatthebastards@inbox.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD975485BA2.0000073Cbeatthebastards@inbox.com>
X-NCF-Filtered: By ProxSMTP on pallando Sat Sep 13 13:15:11 2014 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] keeping torcloud alive
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

$20/year would encourage me to keep torcloud running with or without a 
home node running.

since torcloud can limit usage accurately per user something like a 
"Bulk deal" with solid use control might go a long way to someone with 
the skills to negotiate with amazon.

that and an incredible archive of node level data.

in terms of torcloud use i suspect amazon's concern will be bandwidth 
use and 40GB/month is roughly the cap in ontario canada for "entry 
level" home broadband connections.  considered "light" in this market 
(most families have to buy more expensive packages and buy overage 
insurance or a larger cap here but that's another story.  it's really 
embarrassing).


steve

On 12/09/2014 11:47 PM, I wrote:
> I don't think a tor proxy is even a tiny burden to Amazon's system so is it possible that they might offer us an ongoing deal which costs, say, $20Aus a year which would be tolerable for many of us?

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

