Delivery-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:00:42 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C28721E0CE2;
	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:00:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F6023F83;
	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:00:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EB523488
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:00:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id oiLKjBhkLZRp for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:00:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.headstrong.de (mail.headstrong.de
 [IPv6:2a02:180:a:25:2::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4761C23043
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:00:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.headstrong.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FDC1C0013E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 21:00:29 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=headstrong.de;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
 :in-reply-to:references:subject:subject:mime-version:from:from
 :date:date:message-id:received; s=mail; t=1410462027; x=
 1412276428; bh=tUK5reMq8TZjMbiFcsRpzVJ55ixmcguRVY0kdiHtXtM=; b=E
 ndJQRuzgZUXR9nzfwvYhQbK4BB9E+8Nvju1tPfoKEzc0ZcicUJCUOG2OPXUVQGwU
 383tlRU2yb4jhOCuvp56TsnDbY7fYxLMYgupyN7P1zB9c0lcBuYm/zwsHtzrfEMA
 h8gal9j0GmDErkwySc+l7/h8PPFgGqxC60MWmV1IV0=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.headstrong.de
Received: from mail.headstrong.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mail.headstrong.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id R9bIhEP_CXj8 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 11 Sep 2014 21:00:27 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5411F12C.9000006@pagan.io>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 18:59:56 +0000
From: Matt Pagan <matt@pagan.io>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <20140903042144.GC12515@torproject.org>
 <54113962.9090908@pagan.io> <5411484A.1010509@torproject.org>
In-Reply-To: <5411484A.1010509@torproject.org>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Dropping Tor Browser support for Mac OSX 10.6?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>



Georg Koppen wrote:
> 
> Keeping support for OS X 10.6 and keeping support for 32 bit is not
> strictly the same. In fact, I'd assume there is only a fraction of OS X
> 10.6 users that would not be capable of running a 64 bit Tor Browser.
> So, what about switching to 64 bit but still supporting OS X 10.6?
> 

Ok thanks for clarifying.

The ratio of 10.6 32-bit users to 10.6 64-bit users, I have less
information on. I could starting asking, but I can imagine it taking a
while to get useful data.

In the absence of more information, I'll abide by your judgment on the
situation.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

