Delivery-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 03:04:11 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,
	RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 869441E0F42;
	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 03:04:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5768E2A839;
	Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:04:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A32672A8F1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:04:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id zyW-pzF1IdHg for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:04:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bilestoad.getfoxyproxy.org (bilestoad.getfoxyproxy.org
 [162.243.99.25])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8312E2A6C3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:04:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [0.0.0.0] (rainbowwarrior.torservers.net [77.247.181.164])
 by bilestoad.getfoxyproxy.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 061991233CF
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 07:03:41 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <5411484A.1010509@torproject.org>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 06:59:22 +0000
From: Georg Koppen <gk@torproject.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <20140903042144.GC12515@torproject.org> <54113962.9090908@pagan.io>
In-Reply-To: <54113962.9090908@pagan.io>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Dropping Tor Browser support for Mac OSX 10.6?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5432780782752520237=="
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--===============5432780782752520237==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="u0Cxiofr0gOFfJfCRKq1PwrvvuwFG6SnM"

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--u0Cxiofr0gOFfJfCRKq1PwrvvuwFG6SnM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Matt Pagan:
>=20
>=20
> Mike Perry wrote:
>> Are there any 10.6 32bit Mac users on this list? Is Tails a workable
>> option for you?

[snip}

> Sorry for asking you to do more work, but I'm requesting that we keep
> supporting Mac OS 10.6 with a deadline, maybe a year in the future.
> (The number of Mac 10.5 users has definitely decreased in the past
> year). If 32-bit Mac Tor Browsers are no longer distributed, I can
> imagine an increase in the help desk volume when confused, sometimes
> desperate, Mac users discover they can't run the Mac Tor Browser on
> their 32-bit Macbook.

Keeping support for OS X 10.6 and keeping support for 32 bit is not
strictly the same. In fact, I'd assume there is only a fraction of OS X
10.6 users that would not be capable of running a 64 bit Tor Browser.
So, what about switching to 64 bit but still supporting OS X 10.6?

Georg



--u0Cxiofr0gOFfJfCRKq1PwrvvuwFG6SnM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Kiv1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--u0Cxiofr0gOFfJfCRKq1PwrvvuwFG6SnM--

--===============5432780782752520237==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

--===============5432780782752520237==--

