Delivery-Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 16:18:15 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF2B31E13E0;
	Tue,  6 Oct 2015 16:18:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D554637BF3;
	Tue,  6 Oct 2015 20:18:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4A037BE7
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  6 Oct 2015 20:18:03 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id RAeXRtVO7DJc for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  6 Oct 2015 20:18:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.22])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8E0937BCB
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  6 Oct 2015 20:18:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost ([37.187.73.137]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx101) with
 ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LdLw5-1aRw2g0LcP-00iSd9 for
 <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 22:17:59 +0200
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 22:17:22 +0200
From: "sh-expires-12-2015@quantentunnel.de"
 <sh-expires-12-2015@quantentunnel.de>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20151006201722.GB13867@localhost.localdomain>
References: <CAKcCSXohYs-2CiRiaMpObDkvvRRhOg23YDnOZA+wr6+=+1kqRw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABMkiz6_nnMpghj-Q4yxKZHKhAdEschZAMybGC_JHjxVR_aJWw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAKcCSXrv9iDswGGwmBdRvv6Z06zURAVS3V6Yox-wT_RJFscH=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABMkiz4prBsatyCz=WZx-6jucUiq3n2_Ox5upDOeH4KCxs1MMw@mail.gmail.com>
 <53c83ea7f52c48a56e9ce37bd69f7745@openmailbox.org>
 <e5bee6d7d1afeb8d82c0922c39b1053e@openmailbox.org>
 <20151005195057.GB24964@localhost.localdomain>
 <08029a42fb0bc2e6cab75e92df12a11a@openmailbox.org>
 <5613CAFB.9020605@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5613CAFB.9020605@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:6zmEfib+/RuVpmDmb1jtmxxTm6pcPVi4ZSWHxkLeyos12hbAfZI
 UHzkY4vdY8EiPSPcvc77s0d01I4qa2Q1TEmRlO0FuESKFh1Nn8beV0vvpobKSK9O5S+MsLR
 M/nm8vcUj++WlnwxBxEEyLXbHmzgXa797jENfzsR/PWfXqzYQic6KXzp/wYQiGZONFQ6urL
 rit6/b9Nxugffmp9SwB8A==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:b2yGOlTTx64=:3DVMViywn9CWeihCAw5RP8
 QftfhM9NvbmHf2+Ir7niRh7vqO7kpbrVrr88y2VeKpYFZYazB3f0Fgy8FtIUEivU1ffcXGSij
 WBX8UCGs4KeNbotElCrMZI9CILTovCdt6k+wGItjkLziMC1aWrEuFoSqdMXBnuffwgbjfY1KB
 fRJYNpmfhO1QMMhxkdLKiB/JAx1XtnhI+f7HRD+j+4SW8w5QMY3/mjkFM6mBTgkoG3gznKid1
 FWUljkB2XooYAiS/DOVmvzWV0tQkXxbQzOmCRk5Wp0TWAxCjhtnD6Ha+7A39P9f9kxVSSyOkz
 r4T2k9PhKAFUxguv61bnx27ofIWHH+PJKjMEusWOfJEjb599g19dENRxzf4mNz+lGwk/+riu5
 YPId7p/tQc9dH9DF+UipwEev5v7irPxRiPAJT5KZVCaAM9usw4Fr0ihnGRJNm59KsIkwByE77
 L8pIzQ3whdInSejmb7+lJNa0vEcHz9CGbISkNRf1JgejKX9LqXKFj96u9oMSCDMZNxBREpF9c
 8uhmSyC2AZNiVBU59tOwAY25BRbUpjrOVKlEPlMiqtkmK0bze3Hl6LE/TRKUP+7HwMeRPGdrL
 qu+vRgCBVVWEtb5rRX5UA+k2KUhAd1/f59y4hKEGu/CybiizPkFPU87CcIcHebhL3KBGhPfsY
 VsMJyLnMvfxCe+To+jgow3uFf6KEPa5l+On1u7PG3Y6WwM54Z5pMnxcPLpbevnKYd9byIBRRO
 rzQxR9fnHHKCsGpjNAE47TiL/3Ofb2uqHHR9NVuRmWVirJRoC0MdJxxeYA735ScjSffuZIf1u
 Sc7aVDs
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Making TBB undetectable!
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 03:22:03PM +0200, aka wrote:
> If millions of people would use the same Firefox on the same version
> with mostly the same browser/javascript behaviour, it would make TBB
> obsolete. Wouldn't it make more sense to include those anonymity patches
> into the mainline Firefox and make them opt-in if the user uses Private
> Browsing?

I think Mozilla is much too diverse, one example is API-Keys for major
search engines, that tie you to distributors (like in Linux
Distribution) and so on, TBB has some properties that don't stand out, 
it comes with a set of addons like noscript, that have a very specific
approach, that isn't available in mainstream or developer, nightly
editons of Mozilla.

And then there are forks like IceWeasel and other spinoffs. Due to the license,
only Mozilla can brand their Browser Mozilla, so operating system does
matter much more if it comes to Mozilla.

TBB wraps around most of the exposed properties. You can diff the repositories 
against eachother, that should give you an idea, how different they are.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

