Delivery-Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 08:14:45 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D16D1E0385;
	Sat,  3 Oct 2015 08:14:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CBD38029;
	Sat,  3 Oct 2015 12:14:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 498A238024
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  3 Oct 2015 12:14:37 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 4U8BgjDPZGiX for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat,  3 Oct 2015 12:14:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-f175.google.com (mail-ob0-f175.google.com
 [209.85.214.175])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 254F53801C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  3 Oct 2015 12:14:37 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obbzf10 with SMTP id zf10so99935892obb.2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 05:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virgil.gr; s=dkim;
 h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-type; bh=0DE5Lk82BFx1HS7P6Rb2xTz5TCbi01AH5jq8a+oVE98=;
 b=Jn+QGU0bRk6Jq2lPdxveKYFYi8HeycpGThc/ZV14OekmseAA9DwNHeS7KZQx1OeTZb
 bXcym9GwTF/ko72JVZCTcvJKSu2/+vi/sCULka0kIl7IoencuhVY3NMYS6sQnwXrQH8+
 +TYKAuYSiQCzCQQam2jlK3784aA2po+YDnDGQ=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
 bh=0DE5Lk82BFx1HS7P6Rb2xTz5TCbi01AH5jq8a+oVE98=;
 b=Ktk4ggVE+Z1oRUZj3J9JS/FGVS5ragy37SCuT4+apL89oax/r9/EUpyfCICDLwgSHl
 v7FUK6xcDAVoOx1ACB2AfRGSBXxVdDBS3ZQPjnE0NpTcdG1lefMxnqSMgJ3Or54E+Xfe
 +VLemhzoOvL28hqRjhUgA47uY7nDliv/mTMeAuDjoN3qvCCnktFt21ygG9qCghNnkLf9
 eYj40ycqAC6Z0UHnUqSL2GMVMNwt+TgThEK3a6RnV9vYFzewVWRIdfZt0D/5DU3nOBZW
 Z0ooZAXjQY7BqpIKnOqAsuGaG2l6C4cfjOWRgesMgycOjtkeeu2rNsiG1YkW92D8IS+1
 smVw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlEzXK7iWTlga+rS4xHZVU6xJlFooaDHa8aFBdRdP4Do79/fmFnq/xeaR6ntKMxEHxpSDin
X-Received: by 10.182.28.165 with SMTP id c5mr12644767obh.29.1443874474800;
 Sat, 03 Oct 2015 05:14:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CADop2NG232W9WKdu4azvr5kncqaGF5KRmd60Frq3K7JE3rkEsg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151003120704.23837.29320@solidarity.enteig.net>
In-Reply-To: <20151003120704.23837.29320@solidarity.enteig.net>
From: Virgil Griffith <i@virgil.gr>
Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2015 12:14:25 +0000
Message-ID: <CADop2NE2WjUokybkED8kep_hegSOEf6B5jYej_5d9oCvX3LuQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Accessing Cloudflare sites on TBB
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

> I would add to the list, that offering read-only access would be nice.
> So just delivering the cached content instead of the captcha, would be a
> very easy solution in that direction.

I like that one.

Just to be concrete, the idea is that if the URL is already cached, to spit
out the cached version.  But if a cached version does not exist, cached
version exists, to spit it out, but if a cached copy does not already
exist, to return the captcha?

-V

On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:07 PM <malte@wk3.org> wrote:

> Quoting Virgil Griffith (2015-10-03 01:40:22)
> > Presuming they are
> > unwilling to completely drop the captcha, what would be a step in the
> right
> > direction?
>
> I would add to the list, that offering read-only access would be nice.
> So just delivering the cached content instead of the captcha, would be a
> very easy solution in that direction.
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

