Delivery-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:30:49 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E4CC1E0BF1;
	Mon, 12 Oct 2015 21:30:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717D0381AA;
	Tue, 13 Oct 2015 01:30:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D4B379F4
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 01:30:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id l-dCKMxnDmOA for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 13 Oct 2015 01:30:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com (mail-lb0-x230.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::230])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFBE025514
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 01:30:38 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by lbwr8 with SMTP id r8so2918158lbw.2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=Xbm8ILSs/uIYjcxigmQbG5cUkIvEa9IHb4L7R/8vQw8=;
 b=Quuf6D5Qe0bl3wtX7cHh1zunrjdDlb467NWyeKTWj8CKuBYhAhccNpipNJw4viwp/y
 R+RG0RkDR2OgT3xjmdb/UCVBYP2tesmt2j0PNOyEKE9SjwDikkEfaD7BCYOeA62crdSb
 LDvVt+EykJIu+Qz7iCOsOQxJgN1fZqNByyIKCMzLgHoe3+tIBas5ofmTTtfT2M72/0iq
 rqXurSamWu1p2xE512noaiZkze5zp+DSijCkCCKfqo35SAQW6gnnQo0NHQYbVB1oawqU
 BqkJCBOPbaLzElZUqpcizOcx7k2B5UMgBF+LvnPdwXUHvtIEYoSaRD8BmUKepYXD0ONW
 668Q==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.25.29.20 with SMTP id d20mr8820382lfd.107.1444699835523;
 Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.25.145.142 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:30:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20151013002519.GC2119@localhost.localdomain>
References: <BLU169-W48AE6CD1424882229A5E6E87320@phx.gbl>
 <CAJVRA1TTgjdOyTEg2q6hwW2nEd38SX2oEV6LrQbjxrsJiquWjg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20151013002519.GC2119@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 18:30:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJVRA1RuisB0Z_dbJ4gncik2Kid1Z2r7cfBPDAAWRfC3dS-7BQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: coderman <coderman@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org, sh-expires-12-2015@quantentunnel.de
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Question
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 10/12/15, sh-expires-12-2015@quantentunnel.de
<sh-expires-12-2015@quantentunnel.de> wrote:
>
> Mozilla browser (and plugins) more or less hardwired to Tor.

there are also significant numbers of browser hardening and
configuration tuning for privacy, beyond just plugins and the Tor
hard-wire-on.

this is the fun part!

(seeing how diff. plugins, browser capabilities affect the ability to
"de-anonymize" you, or affect your privacy)



>>  - TAILS
> Distribution (app-armored) failing to boot, when no NIC is
> present or detected (last time I checked).

you track current? ;)



>>  - TransProxy [
>> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TransparentProxy ]
>
> Well, if insanity is defined by doing the same stuff and expecting
> different results, you should check yourself.

TransProxy does indeed provide different results, depending on client
behind the proxy.

"Using a Tor circuit and exit" is sometimes synonymous with "Perfectly
and uniquely identified". E.g. doing it wrong. Also part of the fun!



> Sorry, if you feel like I bash you, but you are being stupid or
> trying to troll OP. The way Tor operates, isn't changed by browser,
> OS (w/w/o VMs) or a proxy. Is there point in trying this?

it is indeed changed; the subtle differences the height of fun and
enjoyable learning.

best regards,
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

