Delivery-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2014 16:17:43 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 998FB1E0EAD;
	Fri,  3 Oct 2014 16:17:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75ADC30FFB;
	Fri,  3 Oct 2014 20:17:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EECE30FF6
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  3 Oct 2014 20:17:29 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id fcHZbgWGlLMK for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri,  3 Oct 2014 20:17:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.ncf.ca (mail.ncf.ca [206.47.12.45])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7F5230FEE
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  3 Oct 2014 20:17:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.ncf.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.ncf.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7BE9F2F3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  3 Oct 2014 16:17:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [172.16.2.5] (192-171-47-81.cpe.pppoe.ca [192.171.47.81])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: fr223)
 by mail.ncf.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C95F99F240
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  3 Oct 2014 16:17:24 -0400 (EDT)
References: <CAOHwwFKOx9zkb0qF0mvUoiRqb-=7swd22qadA-AVz+mWvQQb-A@mail.gmail.com>
 <7c154825-d74c-456e-91ff-89865e728da6@email.android.com>
 <CAJoS0DXCqTQ82ytKdJXztUdHhUf8v_iA12r83fkG2ETMBxdVRg@mail.gmail.com>
 <542D9828.6010008@torproject.is>
 <CAJoS0DV_tJvNeajbAeMmCYPaivmHgAkLBQ8NQO0jWijXGL+rxQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <542DB469.6050801@riseup.net>
 <CAJoS0DXmKD6Av9nbJdUBUvbTo7wa3xrQuyN4TnKHbg7SDTZXig@mail.gmail.com>
 <542DE328.6020006@riseup.net> <BBF13601-6B2B-4AA6-82BC-57AB9A4AD28E@ncf.ca>
 <CAJoS0DVk48OC-qZ1=e2iv1kBoyqgONEw=Nic8mUCz2+6X+W_Ow@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJoS0DVk48OC-qZ1=e2iv1kBoyqgONEw=Nic8mUCz2+6X+W_Ow@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Message-Id: <82EE6258-D0E0-4265-B43D-0B6C3D72CC2C@ncf.ca>
From: stn <stn@ncf.ca>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2014 16:17:15 -0400
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
X-NCF-Filtered: By ProxSMTP on pallando Fri Oct  3 16:17:26 2014 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Tor in the media
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

i wish i could recall which talk it was.  i've watched so many without taking notes recently as a quick study aid.  

sorry about that.




On Oct 3, 2014, at 8:48 AM, z9wahqvh wrote:

> thank you, this is exactly the sort of thing I was looking for. I'll see if
> I can find it in one of Roger's videos, though if anyone has a specific
> pointer that would be very much appreciated.
> 
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 7:57 PM, stn <stn@ncf.ca> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> i think roger dingledine presented some short timeline evidence awhile
>> back in a video i saw but this is from memory.
>> 
>> a US university and the DoJ usa tallied tor traffic on their relay and
>> only found something like 3% "unwanted" traffic.
>> 
>> that could have included things like copyrighted music sharing.
>> the study wasn't continued for some reason.
>> 
>> maybe someone who can correctly recall the event or study can fill in some
>> blanks and verify but ...
>> 
>> only 3% "unwanted" traffic. that's easy to take IMO.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Oct 2, 2014, at 7:43 PM, Mirimir wrote:
>> 
>>> On 10/02/2014 04:35 PM, z9wahqvh wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 10/02/2014 01:24 PM, z9wahqvh wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Even if (for argument's sake) 99% of Tor users/uses were unqualifiedly
>>>>> evil, that would say nothing about Tor. At most, it would speak to its
>>>>> relatively slow uptake overall, and perhaps to the prevalence of evil
>> in
>>>>> the world. An anonymity system with a backdoor for outing evil (however
>>>>> defined) would be unworkable, and would soon die.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> I don't know how to parse "say" in this paragraph. It certainly seems to
>>>> "say" something about the role of unsurveillable absolute anonymous
>>>> communications systems and who is going to be attracted to them and why.
>>> 
>>> If everyone used "unsurveillable absolute anonymous communications
>>> systems", the prevalence of evil on them would be the same as the
>>> overall prevalence of evil. Right? Those who play on the supposed
>>> association of Tor with evil are not friends of freedom.
>>> 
>>>> It also would seem to raise serious questions about whether such efforts
>>>> should be supported
>>> 
>>> If you choose to support Tor, then do. If you don't, then don't. Others
>>> can make their own choices, based on their principles and values.
>>> 
>>>> --and, to raise questions raised in other threads here, whether ISPs and
>>>> other service providers and websites should let Tor relays through.
>>> 
>>> There are more-effective solutions that don't hurt the innocent.
>>> 
>>>> Note that if you are correct, you are painting an extremely dark picture
>>>> of our political future, in which constitutional governance and rule of
>>>> law become, strictly speaking, impossible. You may think that this will
>>>> decrease the amount of evil in the world. My reading of world history
>>>> suggests otherwise.
>>> 
>>> It should be obvious that I'm no statist. But discussions of politics
>>> are off-topic on this list. So I'll not address the rest of your post.
>>> 
>>> <SNIP>
>>> --
>>> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
>>> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>> 
>> --
>> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
>> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>> 
> -- 
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

