Delivery-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 17:11:56 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AB2C1E030B;
	Fri, 31 Oct 2014 17:11:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1611731556;
	Fri, 31 Oct 2014 21:11:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10522314F6
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 21:11:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id jCniZFJl5h5l for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 31 Oct 2014 21:11:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2CBC31251
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 21:11:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.1.0.2] ([37.24.145.253]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with
 ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LdHqj-1YRrZs0PkP-00iTi7 for
 <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 31 Oct 2014 22:11:41 +0100
Message-ID: <5453FB0B.4050503@unterderbruecke.de>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 22:11:39 +0100
From: Random Tor Node Operator <tor@unterderbruecke.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <20141031122302.GA5554@glue.grepular.com>
 <D078CF97.816C%alecm@fb.com> <5453AF92.906@afo-tm.org>
 <20141031161231.GE25941@inner.h.apk.li>
 <CAMCPh3x2ddjwrV-cDP9Xd1yrTS0J4R2Ftx8+5bN4GFsgoW8JDg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAnkLT3M0aRUk15PrHudBJSJ-9OJNMT4p2eQk1MmPbErxgXUwA@mail.gmail.com>
 <5453D40C.6060905@unterderbruecke.de>
 <000901cff548$cabc4420$6034cc60$@alizeepathology.com>
In-Reply-To: <000901cff548$cabc4420$6034cc60$@alizeepathology.com>
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:ANu+c0JVN40i6x9yroEgZu0lhe1j+lHGaA8agb+D950X2ZVXnhv
 QJzGT7+dWG52SvZosOm/acWpjPubjzKbsBr+AJP48SQ87xAkgxgJAuttwibg02KfF5q9RrP
 vWCDZGAmqAvMV13ZqDGqb5/HiaBzKStXcID/AALe8E3p5XKZjAP+ZD4wmup6fhkCFi0iwhq
 Go6BxNC9gxRbzNO50u9Uw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Facebook brute forcing hidden services
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 31.10.2014 21:25, Derric Atzrott wrote:
>>> Honestly if I was running an exit node still. I'd just add
>>> facebook to nullroute right now.
>> 
>> That would probably have gotten you the BadExit flag, though.
> 
> He wouldn't get it if he advertised that Facebook was null routed
> though right?  As in he rejects it in his exit policy.

Yes, if he puts all of Facebook's IP ranges in his ExitPolicy and
keeps that (probably time-dependent) list up to date all the time.

Using the method described in [1], I currently get 72 IP ranges for
Facebook.


[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11164672/list-of-ip-space-used-by-facebook
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=xD7V
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

