Delivery-Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:10:41 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F18791E0CA3;
	Thu, 30 Oct 2014 17:10:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2B3313A4;
	Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:10:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3DFD31073
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:10:31 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id BebheV-MJ9vW for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:10:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22e.google.com (mail-qc0-x22e.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22e])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8884831056
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 21:10:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id r5so4905338qcx.5
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:10:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=+wcpM0VI/9gjtNuSKqklHev0rbR+m0NlndSHzyJD3mY=;
 b=HXtpAwq6s5WR7q2IQlGD9Vq6ZGcwtnf6hLVAchCy9UC+ShD81i+4rwjp8R11yAa2p0
 UkKsK5Q6ZDMnpIxItSaQaCOlVX9Gtnv6eWcDG/tU5qOyKlA3nPHZqXtlCkWRYW4s5/Io
 nJJ/UHgVDQUvPurVszXJ3OFWFnzBc7h39nM0ChmCjv6BebLTX2VLB8ox8RvoIi5AmXfn
 twjsqyeX+KXujI6H9dDjkvgIju/7DBm0psaR6Sl6qlzNHtlA3jNOfcUgyKmJ68cznjpx
 zbhgDa0aO8mLUekD9VsA5G9SxO0WYMeIhaHclbHlgaAArDO7zzYQ4T96K+l6fzaKsChl
 lErA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.81.210 with SMTP id f76mr28696768qgd.60.1414703425978;
 Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.168.9 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <a06cb37688824cd1b4472ff571155c90.squirrel@bitmailendavkbec.onion>
References: <a06cb37688824cd1b4472ff571155c90.squirrel@bitmailendavkbec.onion>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:10:25 -0700
Message-ID: <CAMMhP+fO3Fzdbt79r4W=MTjx6VbY7YcjjBRENFd1_BnzgRHY+A@mail.gmail.com>
From: nasuno <nasunorahl@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Questions about crypto used in TAP/Ntor
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Sounds like the NSA to me.

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:22 AM,
<BM-2cUqBqHFVDHuY34ZcpL3PNgkpLUEEer8ev@bitmessage.ch> wrote:
> Dear experts,
>
> Want to clarify some things:
>
> 1. The fignerprint of a Tor relay which is advertised in the direcotry
> data is a SHA1 sum of which key? Sice now a relay has a secret onion key
> and a secret key for Ntor.
>
> 2. The fingerprint (since it's a hash sum of the key) is what strengths
> encryption between relays or clients and relays, kind of like a CA in SSL?
> That is why the directory authorities sign the list of fingereprints - is
> this correct?
>
> 3. How strong is Ntor compared to TAP? As I can see in latest Tor version
> now clients prefer Ntor by default - are there any plans to deprecate TAP
> in teh future?
>
> 4. The fingerprint is a SHA1 hash, as described in the papers. Any plans
> to move in the immediate future to a stronger hash algorithm, like SHA256?
>
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

