Delivery-Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:19:15 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B42D1E1078;
	Tue, 14 Oct 2014 19:19:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D153122D;
	Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:19:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2077531215
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:19:07 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id b3YXEm24rLLw for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:19:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1DE93119A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 23:19:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from berryeater.riseup.net (berryeater-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.120])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A9484082A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 14 Oct 2014 16:19:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1413328744; bh=mvSe6tsPtV15yatGZ0zJm7fT3zi0yPl2GXhASq2PIHI=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=fDer7O6fvFLLkxgGPQe9io6fIsKfHd1Sk7CWqWajuzuCHhpxSY2fEnBcy//2Q5pVQ
 HHRfMkpnXanK8fbvApCu/spOUxzh6qhfKMVVKle9poBSkfsC8oScH7U6xIMxDTNx6U
 eIod3mXvuRec+BOSTnQt7CodNwubBIVDiPXhA8C4=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: mirimir) with ESMTPSA id 56A1042C31
Message-ID: <543DAF60.6030700@riseup.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2014 17:18:56 -0600
From: Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <9c75bcd857735052022e6c6594245178.squirrel@zsolxunfmbfuq7wf.onion>
 <543D5F94.5020209@intersafeit.com>
 <583b580f4d5bd6ef30a1b1973db4f18f.squirrel@zsolxunfmbfuq7wf.onion>
In-Reply-To: <583b580f4d5bd6ef30a1b1973db4f18f.squirrel@zsolxunfmbfuq7wf.onion>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] [tor-relays] GoodBadISPs revamp?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 10/14/2014 04:52 PM, mikael ball wrote:
> i'm running a (few) non-exit relays on digitalocean, for example:
> https://globe.torproject.org/#/relay/E3D1A10B487356FA91027D84CCB7E1C90A9D11E6
> 
> i haven't gotten any complaints because of the lack of an exit policy; the
> choice comes from their TOS option that you are legally liable for all
> traffic going in and out of the server.
> 
> i suggest just turning on a non-exit policy and just donate the traffic as
> a middle or guard node.
> 
> mikael ball

The problem with that, I think, is that there's a shortage of good
exits, and (from what I've read) a surplus of middle and guard nodes.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

