Delivery-Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 21:03:41 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6E561E0F5C;
	Sun, 12 Oct 2014 21:03:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CE6311A1;
	Mon, 13 Oct 2014 01:03:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CA6331192
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 01:03:33 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id yfwTiPDtwC4q for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon, 13 Oct 2014 01:03:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3F7131088
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 01:03:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from berryeater.riseup.net (berryeater-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.120])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 114144ECAA
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 18:03:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1413162210; bh=CS1SQceS2NHBqQM7sCN6xB+FItw6MdgUlM/UgSJ49G8=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=clqkENf/dKbMBeNTIHYnkJ8hq1Auctskb95vJFsrFxDemfulbU4B+ZWtbdmtWC9OH
 yMR2oGECqbdCpP0faSz+Tm8cAcHN1bjVKTJlCXQH7BH+eG/MpFr4bjtmHopm5tvbtN
 D/+8HrJ72fV45uCREA9eIdZSf9lkgL5/N3h2AVMw=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: thomaswhite) with ESMTPSA id D2F8B42D06
Message-ID: <543B24DB.2090706@riseup.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:03:23 +0100
From: Thomas White <thomaswhite@riseup.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <9c75bcd857735052022e6c6594245178.squirrel@zsolxunfmbfuq7wf.onion>
In-Reply-To: <9c75bcd857735052022e6c6594245178.squirrel@zsolxunfmbfuq7wf.onion>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] GoodBadISPs revamp?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Keep the conversation on [tor-relays] so anyone who wants to
participate please reply on that side (cross posting is fine to let
people know but I feel it's best kept to relay operators since they
are the ones who are probably most knowledgeable about it).

- -T

On 13/10/2014 01:56, subkeys@riseup.net wrote:
> [cross-posted on tor-talk and tor-relays]
> 
> i've found that the Tor GoodBadISPs list [1] is somewhat outdated
> on current hosts that allow Tor (exit) relays to be hosted. i'm
> trying to find a cheap host that allows exits to be operated from
> their services, and navigating the outdated list and finding an
> operator that isn't extremely expensive is time consuming (some
> entries go back to 2010!).
> 
> should the community start a revamp project (or start a whole new
> list)? i'd be willing to donate my time to help get this started if
> need be.
> 
> thanks. ---- mikael ball 0xB1910271AE8587F4 @subkeys
> 
> [1]: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
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=IXEG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

