Delivery-Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 20:57:09 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D24C1E0056;
	Sun, 12 Oct 2014 20:57:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2C863129A;
	Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:57:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E64311C4;
 Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:56:58 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id KF4rX2wWde2T; Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:56:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB7D13117A;
 Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:56:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from berryeater.riseup.net (berryeater-pn.riseup.net [10.0.1.120])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA" (not verified))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54D8B507E3;
 Sun, 12 Oct 2014 17:56:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1413161815; bh=l/uoNlE24DgXIo3o/SKnLvY39CAlaLJnkc+lZoOxJ0M=;
 h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:From;
 b=sbAPz4+ZKE+ji2n7E77RymANfTIHJvMgWyV3iwMQV0XObMY4nacKoQ8Ul+gShSDEe
 4p1FDm2vPep9uNJHReyQ0IiboUHrIf+xnwlPiYmzNOJD6vZ+zLyoPlW379PXyNakys
 H1VjVBQcBECfOSVOtnoSfDhqsamjXzQHb6is1QNo=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: subkeys) with ESMTPSA id 32DFB42D06
Received: from localhost (127.0.0.1) (SquirrelMail authenticated user subkeys)
 by zsolxunfmbfuq7wf.onion with HTTP; Sun, 12 Oct 2014 17:56:55 -0700
Message-ID: <9c75bcd857735052022e6c6594245178.squirrel@zsolxunfmbfuq7wf.onion>
Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2014 17:56:55 -0700
From: subkeys@riseup.net
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.4 at mx1
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-talk] GoodBadISPs revamp?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

[cross-posted on tor-talk and tor-relays]

i've found that the Tor GoodBadISPs list [1] is somewhat outdated on
current hosts that allow Tor (exit) relays to be hosted. i'm trying to
find a cheap host that allows exits to be operated from their services,
and navigating the outdated list and finding an operator that isn't
extremely expensive is time consuming (some entries go back to 2010!).

should the community start a revamp project (or start a whole new list)?
i'd be willing to donate my time to help get this started if need be.

thanks.
- ----
mikael ball
0xB1910271AE8587F4
@subkeys

[1]: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/GoodBadISPs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=YSqt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

