Delivery-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 02:41:03 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E46E51E0A89;
	Wed,  8 Oct 2014 02:41:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED7930BB6;
	Wed,  8 Oct 2014 06:40:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8DFC30AAE
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed,  8 Oct 2014 06:40:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at eugeni.torproject.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id gPb7guDJzBA5 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed,  8 Oct 2014 06:40:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-x22d.google.com (mail-vc0-x22d.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22d])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A57FA309DC
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed,  8 Oct 2014 06:40:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f173.google.com with SMTP id ij19so6150191vcb.32
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=tM2h+2uXnZQls4TR10F7PRt1jEBrEhz3ZilrbhShahI=;
 b=r+vBc3XwJjwzgfCW7xvlKtX1dKtI7zw2JlU5qBklkbuEpUWtHm6P/E1v7xYY5EfKaX
 nhS4HtcGFdk4eMZbIt1QL+MoX51PLtddICgjUIzYR7UP+upIaedS42iGFkrXyMCdw9iM
 LnaqOYhaOrVJx6VxWUbxJRaF2I7y2WTlkFnLr2/0Jx/MV6SeQMXclcJmfGB5AVbYxRfV
 dCimDhd9F8IxS3bWhzI0J12nkNLFEODrxFldYx+KndOcIUvY9smlkHQogr6b0IAtW/a4
 MNCXJ4gRzkCvZPP/owUDX+3nXU1fk8IJlrHX0UXiVEC/k4ULO/HF33n7IKMH312zSP/t
 zSJA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.221.20.4 with SMTP id qm4mr8117969vcb.58.1412750450069; Tue,
 07 Oct 2014 23:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.221.64.74 with HTTP; Tue, 7 Oct 2014 23:40:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <54349BB1.1050708@torproject.org>
References: <54346FEA.3030307@eff.org>
	<54349BB1.1050708@torproject.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 02:40:50 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti28aA4KDodeHSDLjiWxv8J6rGf2CH7JW4V0qZ+WDK07Sag@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Double-checking a couple questions about node churn
	rate
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Karsten Loesing <karsten@torproject.org> wrote:
> On 08/10/14 00:57, Jeremy Gillula wrote:
>> 1. Does anyone have an idea of what the usual churn rate is for Tor
>> nodes? (I'm guessing fairly low for most nodes, but if anyone has even
>> rough numbers, that would help...)
>
> As one random starting point for your research, take a look at Figure
> 4.5 on page 83 (page 106 in the PDF, 2.9M):
>
> http://freehaven.net/anonbib/cache/loesing2009thesis.pdf
> ...
> If you want to do some more analysis, fetch the latest consensus
> tarball(s) and write a script that compares contained fingerprints ("r"
> lines) for the churn question
>
> https://collector.torproject.org/archive/relay-descriptors/consensuses/

Not an answer, yet maybe within the last few months I did post some
churn questions that could be answered by whoever likes to do churn
research. I don't have the link handy but probably used 'churn' or
'turnover' in it. I think someone else added a couple more questions.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

