Delivery-Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 16:44:08 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1406C1E0AEA;
	Sat, 21 Nov 2015 16:44:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07A037C2B;
	Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:43:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A266B371C7
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:43:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id C2usVrMsTqga for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:43:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from continuum.iocl.org (continuum.iocl.org [217.140.74.2])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8363370AF
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 21 Nov 2015 21:43:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (from krey@localhost)
 by continuum.iocl.org (8.11.3/8.9.3) id tALLhot28616;
 Sat, 21 Nov 2015 22:43:50 +0100
Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2015 22:43:50 +0100
From: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20151121214350.GF16523@inner.h.apk.li>
References: <CAPjf7ZXsPCo2U0rXD2uXWsrxc5Do=9_1KUyY1JrU+gYztNdXbg@mail.gmail.com>
 <564F9FD7.3060803@riseup.net>
 <AA7E7174-841B-4710-BFFA-0CE406F9F22F@gmail.com>
 <564FA467.3060905@riseup.net>
 <CAB7TAMmfAUO1+_kFhMXvSKGZCaBp-ZuMQ8BzHYt_GqphojEofA@mail.gmail.com>
 <8AAB7E6C-291F-41B8-B8DC-C0D4CB2F37B9@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8AAB7E6C-291F-41B8-B8DC-C0D4CB2F37B9@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-message-flag: What did you expect to see here?
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] MITM attack on TLS
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 17:18:00 +0000, Justin wrote:
...
> SSH is probably more dangerous than OBFS4 because it coulee be detected with a DPI fingerprint.  They might question that.  I think Tor with transports is good.

On that paranioa level OBFS4 is as dangerous as SSH - it doesn't matter
if they see traffic they can fingerprint as ssh or they see traffic they
cannot fingerprint. They get suspicious in both cases.

Andreas

-- 
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

