Delivery-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:17:59 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A8361E0700;
	Fri, 13 Nov 2015 06:17:57 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B46738558;
	Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:17:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBB938458
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:17:49 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id X1BH2MXPqJuo for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:17:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-oi0-x232.google.com (mail-oi0-x232.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::232])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BC9738455
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:17:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by oiww189 with SMTP id w189so47776196oiw.3
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 03:17:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=bentasker.co.uk; s=google;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=XE+0BiOc3pcy7OuOyuZ2rFbyxjr5zM33wcQJlgOQcRA=;
 b=YVdLFjBdZUfuOBpGWRQ7s67/o2HANPgj50Odxrof1C3u/nsEXxe5/l05uJ7xj5a20C
 H1OywH+nRXzmwyctXcxoj4JfnGiiWIKG6eI7omqhxIUzUh64ZzQsHudfnTWCntFvYcjl
 nDklcorkyAxU+YKU4NCISMmKctE4hmann1SRI=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=XE+0BiOc3pcy7OuOyuZ2rFbyxjr5zM33wcQJlgOQcRA=;
 b=Sm+BxJzCHSgQMjUq6398eNizn4D19fayXrtHjP5+vqJKTQtbpY10lRTpTibD5bVQmp
 qHf4N69jPoGO4bZgNh9/jXfwAb1S3GcnsciqJISLhPZj9eYlF8b71C82q8y7cMa+HS8i
 Wln7WqCvxqlBChK3OvR2tTrN64Ttka5ipBoHFIE7DE8rGM6/6rtMCkr/Q4DHuBLS+Xjb
 H3iFK3B5ZijGwW8+2CJxFE8dcMTehQ3tHvb+pMCCw0pcNhpIHclcRQa/AGvFJ+26BcwG
 lEfIcHc/OaZJxZzjgxIzHBTQE0+Yu1jVByPF1pLf/oy76tA2rjiFWxnbSCERIhvuK51a
 Og1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlihmO0hQ2P8ukZuNaGpYCYn4B7O/mB13FYRgPWb16yTTP6K+/7qDZf8sOwKgy7F4LsG3T8
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.104.11 with SMTP id d11mr11668776oic.128.1447413466738; 
 Fri, 13 Nov 2015 03:17:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.76.154.130 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 03:17:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [2001:470:69d7:4ca::ffd6]
In-Reply-To: <B79084FEAF7.0000005Dbeatthebastards@inbox.com>
References: <cad2ti29ouvgxvshd3qea6mukabw2ytnqjg1enx0o-8hgjzgcpa@mail.gmail.com>
 <563a39e7.4060305@cni.net> <564094e6.8040900@gmail.com>
 <CALddkbrB2yPhSdREfMagHixwfL9SG049JRLpTF_snwFctkkZYQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <B79084FEAF7.0000005Dbeatthebastards@inbox.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:17:46 +0000
Message-ID: <CABMkiz5-5dFeDjpp9nM4UoLzUqgo7BP3UNVLRQRehZbExB8rtg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ben Tasker <ben@bentasker.co.uk>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Fwd: [tor-relays] Tor Project slandered?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

> Using terms like dark net is part of the problem.
True. After all, it's not like nothing untoward happens on "the clearnet".

To be fair to Hollywood though, at least the average person *expects* them
to dramatise etc. Not sure how I missed it the first time round, but in my
book, this by the City of London Police rates far worse -
https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140615/06475527587/city-london-police-claim-that-tor-is-90-internet-is-risk-to-society.shtml



On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:50 PM, I <beatthebastards@inbox.com> wrote:

> Using terms like dark net is part of the problem.
> Tor is neutral. Criminal activity is just that.
> Describe things less hollywood and people might think clearly.
>
> Robert
>
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>



-- 
Ben Tasker
https://www.bentasker.co.uk
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

