Delivery-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 13:28:55 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D5F71E033B;
	Tue,  4 Nov 2014 13:28:54 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02BA242ED;
	Tue,  4 Nov 2014 18:28:48 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55A72DA17
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  4 Nov 2014 18:28:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id eXbMjxuAaITY for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  4 Nov 2014 18:28:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-f175.google.com (mail-vc0-f175.google.com
 [209.85.220.175])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A426828496
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  4 Nov 2014 18:28:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hy4so6989042vcb.34
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:28:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=OYllO+9A9mzuaC/G2q+JCtJsbhVJ//tAl9H1XZnMGgA=;
 b=TBqgFYYfL5WmBfj+0UsAcFNDswelNhLCX3c3gJY5Uhg7VxKNN8C7nzIJElsUA6VxY5
 SL66MzpGcD+s0w+aKB1xCbC/aAppYBbRSPtKpohF336lEKIOqHQTLv3Nhr2rtqGsoWff
 PTU3cWJGaQiiWlENtwv32avnIKdXFEz+APaYUTGFN5D2tHT2iKIsun/9dU/9dvUD5AWZ
 cXw+N2M6RMaEW1Eey9dUnFfCFAAIJoUPr8QjOzawVhi/6q/RlZhKmuS7XCrqqFsmYYg4
 icen5pZbklp7fVJ3tUwfAv5nMJRwgbJWqHmy8rYc8y9u6yjvq7ARUkzwym4KlguQ2Wfw
 0leQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnvZpsgUsYjwuxtrQeR3aD5hcx0qhT2gcpxvM30nHxeQfOHfe3bkB+Umn4XNMTOu1w503+P
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.52.128.105 with SMTP id nn9mr1184783vdb.59.1415125722672;
 Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:28:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.31.181.15 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:28:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [50.78.106.66]
In-Reply-To: <CAJVRA1QsQQpA0WJ+40vv2DML6YnnKZcoHjxLy1mv7vvB3i8wpw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADw1SfEvdtayywkz3jo3gnFtDRqdwwtcV2+iRuBej4tH8h6Rqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJVRA1QsQQpA0WJ+40vv2DML6YnnKZcoHjxLy1mv7vvB3i8wpw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2014 10:28:42 -0800
Message-ID: <CADw1SfGsZOCJkDvnec-_e9-tfFpz0Xdjtbm5=XN-t-2spqvFMQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Cyrus Katrak <cy@kr36.co>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Krypton Anonymous: A Chromium Tor Browser
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

No, currently I am not using any Isolation flags. I assume this means all
tabs are sharing the same stream. I could trivially use something like
IsolateDestAddr, but I assume what you are suggesting is to have one Tor
SOCKS port per tab?

On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:12 AM, coderman <coderman@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 11/3/14, Cyrus Katrak <cy@kr36.co> wrote:
> > https://github.com/kr36/seaturtle
>
> cool :)
>
>
> > At a high level:
> > - Process per tab security model, with each tab owning it's own in-memory
> > state (cache, cookies, local storage, hsts db etc...).
>
> do you use any stream isolation per tab behavior? (perhaps via the
> SOCKSPort isolation options?)
>
> i will take a look further, with feedback, as time permits.  good stuff!
>
>
> best regards,
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

