Delivery-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 05:51:30 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A4FF1E02B7;
	Sun, 16 Nov 2014 05:51:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B3C931C8A;
	Sun, 16 Nov 2014 10:51:20 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829AF31C88
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 10:51:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Y-S9VO7ReJJR for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 16 Nov 2014 10:51:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-x231.google.com (mail-vc0-x231.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::231])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F7BE31C87
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 10:51:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ij19so4986393vcb.36
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 02:51:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=virgil.gr; s=dkim;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :content-type; bh=O4ywCL8mGhGeNXqIJPm++MgpJ3TAtsTxz/GwB+SFQIU=;
 b=Y7RSNOsXMqgdjcRKxmrhFrnxkH32nBI1+BQqsLfmmO2RumtlGX61pC2qWrJ369J9TX
 IibXorsfuGQXr+waoMl2QOIkhcnqLmTkmYXj0iApPud4rTGeW3jaK7YXoFxcLmXGcw3C
 kYkHbrNdC+zeKwPJ4120NMLLQa3bv6KoO8QGc=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:content-type;
 bh=O4ywCL8mGhGeNXqIJPm++MgpJ3TAtsTxz/GwB+SFQIU=;
 b=gaoveLsZZ76zrya3tWCpbB8V/laa3bMhCmAZY7+yYheGdd1WXe3uH1K26lYonpvXCz
 cahfT6oy2osXKpp8VaCvFhGH6XupllMDo4a77yInN3CN3QWEOuuXKchYSxgguJWw9TZ4
 uUUA30OaIJ8ibnlIQk+23PDPvs1fULCi2JVdWnrrWiyk65NL+gKqSmyHe50azwxvg1Tj
 CmQ8YZ4GKV6BcMr5iIK3x8zAOaUcKff6xrDcx0y01axF/JCfjV4cykK2IvrwPd/AcA/b
 mn5Ho8b0maKVvLMGyQhwSzMIUBexnZAIKzDeU9igUv364Y6wc5DC1M0y9+KcgteMZUe4
 jLgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl3il8NBg+ClDXlH/r/M0xOrCS6/Hz+2V5EoznAZaZ04bcrQHp1IG9rwEHr8vNSB2/NOnqd
X-Received: by 10.53.1.12 with SMTP id bc12mr6364924vdd.87.1416135073397; Sun,
 16 Nov 2014 02:51:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.66.73 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 02:50:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <F162A05D842.000001E7beatthebastards@inbox.com>
References: <20141113015303.ga44443@moria.seul.org> <5464e9b8.6080307@tig.as>
 <cadop2ne9_+zgdhoiqq8_nd6wvwlzfytamb-kmq0im91d-6ptia@mail.gmail.com>
 <1415856559.3215529.190419229.7967ca45@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <20141115184206.228d583d@localhost.localdomain>
 <f0abdb5fd54.00000195beatthebastards@inbox.com>
 <cadop2nei2jiapcrtflgzsasncsyj8+yzanv1zx-ufe1nqv3qla@mail.gmail.com>
 <512753.55494436343036332d31343036383939313433@popretr.messagingengine.com>
 <5464e5a1.8020003@gnu.org>
 <cadop2nf-p++a=n7feaniq3wrr=oxrp1j7mbx10306+oieya19q@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141113135238.ga7688@vpn212046.nrl.navy.mil>
 <20141113053202.gk23933@mail2.eff.org>
 <54668360.7060507@aol.com> <5467bbdf.9040708@aol.com>
 <20141116110326.7bb65aed@localhost.localdomain>
 <F162A05D842.000001E7beatthebastards@inbox.com>
From: Virgil Griffith <i@virgil.gr>
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 02:50:53 -0800
Message-ID: <CADop2NFfYRJSHQ4+ovW7i4sxdwPz1rjk_vA9TXfUMHFwjT1oQw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "tor-talk@lists.torproject.org" <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] "Hidden Services" vs "Onion services"
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Right now I perceive consensus in accepting the term "onion services"
as a synonym for "hidden services", and when it's specifically a
website, also suggesting the more specific term, "onion site".

Cool.  I support that.  For nonnative speakers it might sometimes to
be useful to say "onion-site" to avoid ambiguity, but "onion site"
should be fine in most cases.

If there's ever an accepted candidate as a replacement for "dark net",
I am interested.  So far the most plausible candidates I've seen are
"onion net" and "onion space".  Which at least follows from the "onion
site" name.

-V

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 6:07 PM, I <beatthebastards@inbox.com> wrote:
>
> Robert wrote
>> Hacker wouldn't have the currency it has if a large part of the
>> pudgy, pizza-eating photophobes didn't perpetuate it for dramatic
>> self-interest.
>
>>Katya wrote
>>I really don't think comments like this help the situation.
>
> Certainly.
> I meant to highlight that the desire for loaded terms is the problem.
>
> Using unclear terms and resorting to jargon to be cooler is one of the barriers I, and many, have found at our early encounters with Tor when we are quite serious about participating in and supporting privacy and rights.
>
> Robert
>
>
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

