Delivery-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 20:05:28 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8957F1E0C13;
	Sat, 15 Nov 2014 20:05:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8ED631B92;
	Sun, 16 Nov 2014 01:05:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4ECE31B91
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 01:05:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id mfrBa9zvXOxq for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 16 Nov 2014 01:05:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx0.mars-attacks.org (mx0.mars-attacks.org
 [IPv6:2001:4b98:dc0:43:216:3eff:fefd:2409])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ED0B31B90
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 01:05:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mx0.mars-attacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 426DA2771
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 02:05:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wxy.mars-attacks.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 8C5631E02DA; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 02:05:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 02:05:15 +0100
From: Nicolas Vigier <boklm@mars-attacks.org>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20141116010515.GB2178@mars-attacks.org>
References: <CADop2NF-P++a=n7FEaniq3Wrr=OXrp1j7mBX10306+oiEYA19Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <1415856559.3215529.190419229.7967CA45@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <20141113053202.GK23933@mail2.eff.org>
 <CADop2NE9_+zGdHOiQQ8_nD6WVWLzfYtAmb-KmQ0iM91D-6PTiA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20141113135238.GA7688@vpn212046.nrl.navy.mil>
 <5464E5A1.8020003@gnu.org> <5464E9B8.6080307@tig.as>
 <54668360.7060507@aol.com>
 <20141115184206.228d583d@localhost.localdomain>
 <CADop2NEMQZV6eFpzZo0Wj_5e90XOejHrnM4JDORB8E4niTJ0-Q@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CADop2NEMQZV6eFpzZo0Wj_5e90XOejHrnM4JDORB8E4niTJ0-Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] "Hidden Services" vs "Onion services"
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Sat, 15 Nov 2014, Virgil Griffith wrote:

> If an expensive marketing company were trying to come up with a term to
> describe more anonymous networks such as .onion, even though "dark net"
> certainly fits, they would probably discourage it because of the reasons
> previously mentioned.
> 
> I don't like "deep web", and I think we can do better than "dark net".  I'll
> accept whatever the TOR leadership tells me to use.  Perhaps something with
> more neutral connotations, something less "veiled net", "incog net" / "
> icognet", or "shielded net".

I think most of the time, it doesn't really make sense to talk about all
the .onion sites as a whole, so I'm not sure that a term is needed to
describe that. There isn't really a network of all those sites, but many
unrelated sites that just happen to be using the same tool (the Tor network)
and have nothing else in common.

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

