Delivery-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 19:46:02 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID,
	UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C85F1E0C10;
	Sat, 15 Nov 2014 19:46:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112B731BA5;
	Sun, 16 Nov 2014 00:45:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A0331B9C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 00:45:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id ZWaUYxbe6jg1 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun, 16 Nov 2014 00:45:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from WM50.inbox.com (wm50.inbox.com [64.135.83.50])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D93231B92
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 16 Nov 2014 00:45:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from inbox.com (127.0.0.1:25)
 by inbox.com with [InBox.Com SMTP Server]
 id <1411151645028.WM50> for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org> from
 <beatthebastards@inbox.com>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:45:47 -0800
DomainKey-Signature: q=dns; a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=inbox.com; s=s1;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:from:subject:to:content-type;
 b=lnaepixZ4Pj8d+BUT25bKgSegu46n+Ob/c8+MgIUbvP3JNhJ5HS2on0lFkmjqB/FaWeO
 sihckHFKygqv00CrUNlN25iWumJy/5D2nBlmsrCtbwc4WYC7yNQYRMu+rAwI9kqF3bFA5Y
 jWwIFRyn32HTF5bEZDY9JK5nZgW6t9I2w=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt;
 d=inbox.com; s=s1;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=bDhNwymM9IBmCEUiSAQdQ5RTrbDhXj8a+sYAy1Q52dI=;
 b=TxnGREYfrd6/C9UreRr68md6yCvYeOZHi88sGB8maZw4enPJl87VXflOP8z9JRu++2bh
 HDJ27wVp0aHoeeIpPvpDvc2iouHhb6gU+sTkScvZxzE/7GuQ/fIaWycNhhtv+QQ4/b9EfS
 /JI2QGK7Ut5DDdYSHbgN4mP/dhoEhx85M=
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:45:47 -0800
Message-ID: <F0ABDB5FD54.00000195beatthebastards@inbox.com>
From: I <beatthebastards@inbox.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <20141116094455.1ac5abef@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20141113015303.ga44443@moria.seul.org> <5464e9b8.6080307@tig.as>
 <512753.55494436343036332d31343036383939313433@popretr.messagingengine.com>
 <1415856559.3215529.190419229.7967ca45@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <cadop2ne9_+zgdhoiqq8_nd6wvwlzfytamb-kmq0im91d-6ptia@mail.gmail.com>
 <54668360.7060507@aol.com>
 <20141115184206.228d583d@localhost.localdomain>
 <cadop2nei2jiapcrtflgzsasncsyj8+yzanv1zx-ufe1nqv3qla@mail.gmail.com>
 <5464e5a1.8020003@gnu.org> <20141113135238.ga7688@vpn212046.nrl.navy.mil>
 <20141113053202.gk23933@mail2.eff.org>
 <cadop2nf-p++a=n7feaniq3wrr=oxrp1j7mbx10306+oieya19q@mail.gmail.com>
 <5467bbdf.9040708@aol.com>
X-Mailer: INBOX.COM
X-Originating-IP: 14.200.2.184
X-IWM-ACU: zbNqDeVEJyj1cCt0doyS5rEJYSEDWID3_j8B1EA1ONsq3luO30fQUldDQ3km
 GNtL6cBvLnqCrYwuPgLWCE7TRE8e7nAaTe13hQO1ASQWqS2vxMu9efNIJ43S
 VOkHXaZ8sBbBbxqjMZfQW6kDi
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] "Hidden Services" vs "Onion services"
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Katya, and all,

SOOOOooooo why don't we use sensible, plain language and stick to it to distuingish ourselves from them?
Hacker wouldn't have the currency it has if a large part of the pudgy, pizza-eating photophobes didn't perpetuate it for dramatic self-interest.

Robert


>> 
>> I think the use of 'dark' is not neutral and it hides a moral
>> geography of the Net, which might appeal to some of the 'insiders'
>> too. I also think that the anti-terrorism, anti-immigrants,
>> anti-whatever symbols (all 'dark' of course) are serious attacks to
>> Internet freedom too.
> 
> Thanks Paolo.
> 
> I agree with everything you said, but the big issue I see is that the
> media is already using the term 'dark', and my impression is that once
> they think they are on to a good thing they will stick with it. It's
> hard to change these things. Think "hacker" -- the original term is
> lost to the greater public.
> 
> I would be *very* happy to be proven wrong!
> 
> --
> kat


-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

