Delivery-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:04:09 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B6671E0AB2;
	Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:04:08 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 421713193A;
	Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:04:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EE4F31915
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:04:02 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id zDvfikgv6ySY for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:04:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:4830:134:3::e])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2663431246
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:04:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ol168-138.fibertel.com.ar ([24.232.138.168]:36484
 helo=raiz.hellekin.gnu)
 by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <hellekin@gnu.org>) id 1XoC34-0006bQ-Pj
 for tor-talk@lists.torproject.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 09:03:59 -0500
Message-ID: <54621750.2050109@gnu.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 11:04:00 -0300
From: hellekin <hellekin@gnu.org>
Organization: https://gnu.org/consensus
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <7488606.2oxgLGVBPl@ncpws04> <2394059.RZp3KPTO9L@ncpws04>
 <5460E186.7070405@gnu.org> <1682155.sfX4lsJYxo@ncpws04>
 <5462117A.9080302@gnu.org> <20141111134745.GE23841@inner.h.apk.li>
In-Reply-To: <20141111134745.GE23841@inner.h.apk.li>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

On 11/11/2014 10:47 AM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:39:06 +0000, hellekin wrote:
> ...
>> But now I think it would be better to explain why it's not necessary,
> 
> You need it if you want to guard against the user device accidentally
> routing around the box?
>
*** That might actually be a feature.  At least during development ;o)

> Also, auto-config of the clients without hassling
> with the upstream DHCP.
>
*** That is a compelling argument.  Zero configuration.

> 
> No need for a switch for a single user device.
> 
> I'm not even completely comfortable with having only one port
> on my router and accessing the DSL modem via VLAN and the switch.
>
*** I am not aware of any (free) hardware that provides a more complex
setup...  If the argument was made properly, maybe Olimex would consider
it...

Thank you for your insight,

==
hk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=Phia
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

