Delivery-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:47:59 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 676CA1E08B6;
	Tue, 11 Nov 2014 08:47:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C33F317A0;
	Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:47:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7783A31785
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:47:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id Kejs9sKmYC8h for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:47:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from continuum.iocl.org (continuum.iocl.org [217.140.74.2])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B6431782
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:47:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (from krey@localhost)
 by continuum.iocl.org (8.11.3/8.9.3) id sABDlkL06535;
 Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:47:46 +0100
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:47:45 +0100
From: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20141111134745.GE23841@inner.h.apk.li>
References: <7488606.2oxgLGVBPl@ncpws04> <2394059.RZp3KPTO9L@ncpws04>
 <5460E186.7070405@gnu.org> <1682155.sfX4lsJYxo@ncpws04>
 <5462117A.9080302@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5462117A.9080302@gnu.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-message-flag: What did you expect to see here?
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Cloak Tor Router
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:39:06 +0000, hellekin wrote:
...
> But now I think it would be better to explain why it's not necessary,

You need it if you want to guard against the user device accidentally
routing around the box? Also, auto-config of the clients without hassling
with the upstream DHCP.

> Given a NIC with Gigabit capacity, is there an actual use-case where 2
> NICs are required instead of one?

No need for a switch for a single user device.

I'm not even completely comfortable with having only one port
on my router and accessing the DSL modem via VLAN and the switch.

Andreas

-- 
"Totally trivial. Famous last words."
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@*.org>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

