Delivery-Date: Fri, 07 Nov 2014 19:23:07 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AD4D1E0DBF;
	Fri,  7 Nov 2014 19:23:05 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D92315B9;
	Sat,  8 Nov 2014 00:23:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BA431575
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  8 Nov 2014 00:22:56 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id lSShQEEtI095 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat,  8 Nov 2014 00:22:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-vc0-x231.google.com (mail-vc0-x231.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::231])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3181314E4
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  8 Nov 2014 00:22:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-vc0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hq11so296043vcb.36
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 07 Nov 2014 16:22:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=8ihqLkydx+DPtBQlqscHqSDFhQgAm+USJ6rm3q11Z+0=;
 b=YYWOp8IyL/RcQUlh44q078kP0OkHSZDgfNTrjigYhoVqwWcQztU2NUGHTW3znQwhwY
 2ZbavBfrdVVigJCQv4Alr4zJ1A8UcT+i8bjnl7SK9aXhZRkBrpOYYOQMcKyCyxRkt9Vq
 6a8PxsyhW4M0poZIZFHZYORiNbNljipnS9MDHKO1z1lHndvwezV94LIG9zDmfixk6h9V
 1SY843enRoKW9DWeMwHmqkgM2AvMoH46lD8yiieNC7MsazLvJTtdeHEJQACW1bL/u/0m
 ejtxwgIzdm/tXYjQYv6Kk//SQqRLH9gol3mE8m8n6uvpTI6WFkt56oLnsm9G0cGlcUCw
 HwPA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.53.10.65 with SMTP id dy1mr5935007vdd.51.1415406174243; Fri,
 07 Nov 2014 16:22:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.221.64.74 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Nov 2014 16:22:54 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti2_XAAMQERRbh48gzzSy385S6cstCT1U1-k6gaUedc_-eg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAD2Ti2_XAAMQERRbh48gzzSy385S6cstCT1U1-k6gaUedc_-eg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 19:22:54 -0500
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti293K-HOTeVgb7kHEQO9wrbew1dc0v=KPUfJ4X1wwy+K_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Cc: cypherpunks@cpunks.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Darknets/science vs. GPA/LEA/Law,
	and playing dirty pool
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Derric Atzrott
<datzrott@alizeepathology.com> wrote:
> warrant request for Benthall and didn't see anything in that besides
> Benthall being stupid and the police being clever.

Reread it. "First" they found the server, then their man, then
trolled up a bunch of stuff happened before and after the server
find to make and support charges on. Look at the dates the
evidence was dug up, not the dates in the evidence itself.

> We'll have to wait for the charging documents to come out for those that
> just got arrested to see how police allege to have found their hidden
> services.  While parallel construction is certainly a possibility, and

> Without an understanding of how hidden services may be broken, there
> is not much that can be done to fix the issue.

I'm going to guess it's not via public papers on locating hidden
services, otherwise they'd just reference that, disclose their operations
and evidence therein, and call it case closed. [Trawling TorHS, Sniper]
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

