Delivery-Date: Sat, 01 Nov 2014 16:41:32 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A41931E03A7;
	Sat,  1 Nov 2014 16:41:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F139D30F0C;
	Sat,  1 Nov 2014 20:41:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5FE1305CE
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  1 Nov 2014 20:41:23 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id qKwfiySwcWIR for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat,  1 Nov 2014 20:41:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22b.google.com (mail-lb0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22b])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B77E2129F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  1 Nov 2014 20:41:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-lb0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u10so5743730lbd.16
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 01 Nov 2014 13:41:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=NBf9XO2Q6SkcvHWz6LA0U1g1SZ6WBcjyt2fnsj5PTio=;
 b=i/7gLRLnM28IlrsjSEp/SzEVCCvMN0R5v5I9GlEumbIg16Qk/Fer3xEEGU7+X97VeJ
 8GuU0fNKnSdQDY+FsGd5KVVcL+VSh0N0UuMaPH3yEIBHTGR7p38Rn1UG9O0AtE97TJqE
 BG6ahBZ2Fhz/Qx00Dv+Jff4bgy1NnI1czoQgwKe2UDgC+SSMmldwYRuB5LO7+S47Fuui
 OR096BukuO76Xadt7n2z5P6maFvsjQmeXijtBTtqKOBLoQhXbIPAesIoYgeT5G5KbY5D
 FGXPefHpAJocvdWC0MKn1lp8Pd0Ww/EL/TXzLz8DmdgtfutChXSHSKa6zI1P0kzpR8+p
 7LFg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.28.101 with SMTP id a5mr37632931lah.52.1414874479936;
 Sat, 01 Nov 2014 13:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.157.133 with HTTP; Sat, 1 Nov 2014 13:41:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <545540FE.5080808@riseup.net>
References: <20141031122302.GA5554@glue.grepular.com>
 <20141031125427.GQ35778@moria.seul.org>
 <20141101013146.GR35778@moria.seul.org>
 <CAD2Ti29nB460jhtsjyq63R1VBcUcXAUQHscqwrVAg=ya3NPpaw@mail.gmail.com>
 <545540FE.5080808@riseup.net>
Date: Sat, 1 Nov 2014 15:41:19 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHZ_AjuPaBgkO1r5eoZ7hiako-mKU-XCRQt4hG7LEDWpzZN1Vg@mail.gmail.com>
From: eric gisse <jowr.pi@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Facebook brute forcing hidden services
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net> wrote:
> On 11/01/2014 02:22 AM, grarpamp wrote:
>> I would never use this unless you were actually censored from
>> accessing facebook via clearnet. All it will do is serve to officially
>> tell facebook that you are a tor user that FB can then further
>> discriminate against as a class in the future once they start to
>> lock down clearnet against exit nodes, travelers, etc or whatever
>> their scheme is or will be.
>>
>> Remember, FB's official policy is still:
>> - Real Names required
>> - Phone Numbers / ID required
>> - DOB required
>> - Gender required
>> - Email required
>> - Etc required
>> - Users are the product that is being mined and sold and shared.
>>
>> Such non optional elements, and choices, powers and rights
>> removed from the user, are in direct opposition to the principles
>> of Tor and anonymity. Normally support for onion/i2p is good thing,
>> but when still backed by crap like this it's largely meaningless.
>
> Perhaps Alec could comment about the applicability of Facebook's
> official "real names" etc policy where users in repressive regimes are
> using https://facebookcorewwwi.onion/ to conceal their locations and
> identities. If users are not allowed -- indeed, strongly encouraged --
> to use pseudonyms under those circumstances, there is ideed zero point
> in providing a hidden-service address.
>

That's what *slays* me about this.

On one hand I think its' great to have a tor hidden service for
facebook as there are legitimate use cases for it.

On the other, the juxtaposition of the least privacy-sensitive tool in
the WORLD against tor is a contrast that damn near hurts to look at.

This will be a continual source of amusement for me, but maybe
something of value will come out of this.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

