Delivery-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 22:37:48 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0ADA1E0DA3;
	Thu,  6 Nov 2014 22:37:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FD32847C;
	Fri,  7 Nov 2014 03:37:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB21B3125E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  7 Nov 2014 03:37:39 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id sd3rH9T_v6Y7 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri,  7 Nov 2014 03:37:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qa0-x233.google.com (mail-qa0-x233.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::233])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E6222847C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri,  7 Nov 2014 03:37:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id f12so1738713qad.38
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 19:37:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=8ViVeCM5mueQ4X3L2DFv0ob0Ffi3KVDxe0JyUDyc0D4=;
 b=cIXeFl6z7CnzcuvXpXICCLxABaP+e2XXO3TKuPc2sYBbn+ynw17kCO4CqJi4WRJC33
 MDxgTaXdRmfb9Rx83GFM+PIXU1Y2XldcrTiPJTceMs40gPLMoEOTP0/UXmkRJfZaFrII
 HJfQ8mmv6Wb8xV30+WBxTIGnT6TzrLruWfC8a9meAQtUPjn/CSBoh+T7RzGI+N4X+GAO
 iJAi4rxZNFLhTQlUpNxAwkoJ7q8idjh6Ou1C9ELwDnhj33X+Y3iWqyEJXKWtFWVWWS/d
 HMWQB0zVdNZIOArylnHYShHyfXodWCuXXznQRZ5DdnZMoBahQgRzoTWBjx1Q3YYWpkCm
 fWPA==
X-Received: by 10.140.39.139 with SMTP id v11mr12531049qgv.45.1415331457216;
 Thu, 06 Nov 2014 19:37:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (host163.190-224-87.telecom.net.ar. [190.224.87.163])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id
 c40sm7547264qge.6.2014.11.06.19.37.35
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Thu, 06 Nov 2014 19:37:36 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <545c3e80.2b5d8c0a.37d9.ffffea48@mx.google.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2014 00:39:12 -0300
From: Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <N1B-_PspDNLugc@Safe-mail.net>
References: <N1B-_PspDNLugc@Safe-mail.net>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.10; i486-slitaz-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Operation Onymous against hidden services,
 most DarkNet markets are down
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 15:51:15 -0500
"Jim Smith" <jimsmitty@Safe-mail.net> wrote:

> Usually you won't go through the trouble of using Tor unless your
> privacy is being attacked. Once you start using Tor it's easier to
> justify surveillance because of Tor's reputation. Now after all that
> you have to figure out how to be anonymous while doing business. We
> haven't mentioned how to avoid phone tapping, hidden microphones, and
> people following you in the streets. Tor is a very small piece to the
> privacy/anonymity puzzle.


	So why would people be tracked in the first place? Are
	you saying that the US government nazis track all of US
	subjects all the time, and that's how they find people who run
	'hidden' services? =


	=





> =

> Complete anonymity and privacy is possible, even in the face of
> advanced surveillance operations. If we make protecting good people
> our priority, instead of fighting evil to the point that it hurts the
> good, this would be much easier to achieve. I think the Tor community
> need to recognize themselves and help each other more, regardless of
> how criminals will take advantage. This is a real challenge for all
> of us, but there's an extreme injustice occurring that's a serious
> threat to all of us. =

> =

> =

> Jim Smith
> --
> =

> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Blaise Gagnon <quebecfibe@gmail.com>
> Apparently from: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Operation Onymous against hidden
> services,most DarkNet markets are down Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 13:13:21
> -0500
> =

> > This is some really bad news for the Tor network if the govs can
> > locate that many people this easily ...
> > =

> > 2014-11-06 12:48 GMT-05:00 mroq qorm <mroqorm@gmail.com>:
> > =

> > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 5:25 PM, =D6yvind Saether
> > > <oyvinds@everdot.org> wrote:
> > > > Because that completely explains why every other DarkNet market
> > > > went down at the exact same time. Yes. And the FBI would never
> > > > lie and find a hidden service one way and later claim they
> > > > found it a another way, now would they?
> > >
> > > operations that involve multiple stings carried out
> > > simultaneously are nothing new
> > >
> > > sure, parallel construction is a problem, also in the SR 1.0
> > > case, but let's not get ahead of ourselves and call tor into
> > > question again
> > >
> > > just seems as if the druggy hipsters are worse at opsec than the
> > > kiddy porn people
> > >
> > > just imagine the positive press for LE if they SAVED THE CHILDREN
> > > --
> > > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
> > >
> > -- =

> > tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> > To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

-- =

tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

