Delivery-Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 14:55:41 -0500
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,T_DKIM_INVALID
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B70B1E0A4B;
	Thu,  6 Nov 2014 14:55:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48F23195E;
	Thu,  6 Nov 2014 19:55:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6DE331932
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  6 Nov 2014 19:55:32 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 33t4NNh7ZAbW for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu,  6 Nov 2014 19:55:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.bitmessage.ch (mail.bitmessage.ch [146.228.112.252])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F5463169A
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu,  6 Nov 2014 19:55:32 +0000 (UTC)
dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=bitmessage.ch; s=mail;
 c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt;
 h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:References;
 bh=KuDsL296aNihMRnNAPUwfhL+msj6+qlkdDretZJAv+E=;
 b=TTMCwcBCFbgRUbuE0XAKhWCFE0cdE8hcGJMb9MmMnFD1ZagwqUnrqvx23UnjLxBKPWZN8LFWgTFMscJyKBIehtacpcNoAd+tfKDRyuhIDJml7YOhnoZfDf1TpeBI8Y6GpaQT37nN3Ghuxnpol0dU+AmCbKNxkBRvMZHgMqyOkNQ=
Received: from localhost (BITMESSAGE [127.0.0.1])
 by mail.bitmessage.ch with ESMTPA ; Thu, 6 Nov 2014 20:55:13 +0100
Message-ID: <09754BBE-9F2B-4C14-8AC0-11E4C1F15FFF@mail.bitmessage.ch>
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 14:55:18 -0500
From: <BM-2cTjsegDfZQNGQWUQjSwro6jrWLC9B3MN3@bitmessage.ch>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <mailman.539.1415303117.3021.tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
References: <mailman.539.1415303117.3021.tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] tor-talk Digest, Vol 46, Issue 19
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Excellent. Thanks!

I'm not sure if you are familiar with a more friendly sandbox use
of docker (subuser), e.g. with an easy firefox setup preconfigured: 
http://subuser.org/
https://github.com/subuser-security/subuser

Perhaps this work might help as a comparison, or to avoid re-inventing
the wheel.



On Thu, 06 Nov 2014 19:45:17 +0000
tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org wrote:

> Hello !
> I found some dockerfile example to use tor within a docker container.
> But all are running tor as root user (which is bad) so I decided to
> make my own Dockerfile with some improvements for example the
> possibility to modify the configuration while the container is
> running.
> 
> check the Dockerfile at :
> https://github.com/revollat/torbox
> 
> What do you think of the code in the Dockerfile ? any ideas for some
> improvements ?
> What do you think about keeping ".tor" directory in a volume ? is
> there security risk ?
> 
> 
> Thanks !

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

