Delivery-Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 09:02:06 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAEE31E04B4;
	Thu, 12 May 2016 09:01:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0159539FDC;
	Thu, 12 May 2016 13:01:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFF139F47
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 12 May 2016 13:01:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id PFR0dSjOEjzs for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 12 May 2016 13:01:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from beleriand.n0.is (93-95-228-168.1984.is [93.95.228.168])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "n0.is", Issuer "n0is intermediate CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E30C394C9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 12 May 2016 13:01:45 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 398 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at eugeni;
 Thu, 12 May 2016 13:01:45 UTC
Received: by beleriand.n0.is (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e866ca45
 TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Thu, 12 May 2016 12:54:59 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Thu, 12 May 2016 12:54:55 +0000
From: ng0 <ng0@n0.is>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20160512125455.GA22344@khazad-dum>
Mail-Followup-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <6C9F4824-E4D0-4952-8DBD-F3AC4F4FF088@rocteur.cc>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6C9F4824-E4D0-4952-8DBD-F3AC4F4FF088@rocteur.cc>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] ProtonMail
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6203817938496918660=="
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>


--===============6203817938496918660==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J"
Content-Disposition: inline


--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 2016-05-12(03:47:55+0300), Jerry Rocteur wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> I tried to post this before but it never got to the list I think.=20
>=20
> I wanted to subscribe to ProtonMail, which I discovered from reading post=
s here on this list.
>=20
> I wanted to get your opinion, is ProtonMail a good solution for encrypted=
 mails or should I look at alternatives.
>=20
> I=E2=80=99ve searched and read quite a few articles and I understand that=
 nothing is really secure .. I also have my own Debian server on the web so=
 I=E2=80=99m open to suggestions if any of you has an opinion.
>=20
> Thanks in advance,
>=20
> Jerry

Keep in mind that ProtonMail is still in beta phase.
They fixed some problems, but they did not address all of my bug reports
so far, which might make it unpleasant to use for people who deal with
mailinglists:
expect people to get angry at you because their
webinterface reply only knows 1 layer of comment block and you can't
even break this block.

This alone + forced html format and no way to hook into with an external
application are big minus for people who care about email as just text,
in my opinion.

--=20
=E2=99=A5=E2=92=B6 ng0

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXNH0eAAoJEAKilhUMIBgjBnAQAJV3UI76qvSXhgYNSRwLAxQ+
siTdJQhq146jhUnrFoWe74lneGWuUmizneu3vJ2q8PPK004SaTOYA/r8JG9YAYMl
dLBSeDiZgQc44hy4vCChIZvdUEzknqhJrluMSAvOTz3hVVfNm122bckvPsXDKSjA
kySsh7U1zmnZaBN+Wl5OIjtieVegPNsSJp+Iqp+pCgH5n/nCocg609LUj7yrtJLZ
+bujflHYKa2DnMrgaY8NEyUbWEN9O2GRtZnq8MJ/Db05+GBUBUfVF9e62fp9AHva
NFlxvl93GsSAj2uS8QoIwTBwmqbYYroftDdUQ2v/jogxUnvi9GH3e00cVUH0+YYC
pJU7e8PiIzowL1ic5hNksL7OY+Co0tDjQhx9d4xEuMl0NELJtY5FqY+fVWkE2rMp
sWcQ3Y4mrUl9SriXPCnn4KgB6869xGq1EljgJA0OKZEqq08WtFk5mhJvWAbIseNR
TV8Dy/blfbbjDc+qTi6mhdhEnfkVVai3FRIq2oRxrhe8pkuXK5UXykJUQ8q82/vv
gr6wXj3Bq14qp6OlxTicJXJ9yEfNOjC7vNHi7BOxhVybgwSjkurLRia94GyXKAzY
UZw4Ichv4gy43AoWPVmd6oaoDEv+4ZjfRehnRPxxWc8bybN+yQEeaLu27ApXvRJI
GKpVtvFVLNmLR5FunIbw
=Q/Ab
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--VbJkn9YxBvnuCH5J--

--===============6203817938496918660==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

--===============6203817938496918660==--

