Delivery-Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 07:24:52 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 817541E034C;
	Tue,  3 May 2016 07:24:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B7C3A82B;
	Tue,  3 May 2016 11:24:44 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 550453A7D5
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  3 May 2016 11:24:41 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id eiEnyQ-_7e5Q for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  3 May 2016 11:24:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 361373A713
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  3 May 2016 11:24:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.164])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "*.riseup.net",
 Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E4F41A209C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  3 May 2016 11:24:38 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak;
 t=1462274678; bh=CgaS7RuJw+1pLKc7/zHlkM05AsPzAUNo2T1DY22DPns=;
 h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From;
 b=JvLxepEtxC5CDsUh7vcdFmr1WX7oYbIdP/UtwH3/f3Gv0FqElOFNYngNNPoqsmOsr
 S8q01l0HnfOqjT7Bgrf21wFmDmNlyubn7HrS3UHBkZTGcA7AZE5xjiQ7fwNVulSEQ5
 CORoAuxYPbxh8G17JlDluuhe7YPqrDukgGVwrtXU=
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 (Authenticated sender: mirimir) with ESMTPSA id DC4954019D
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <9ec7ae8d5920ed2d9226ec5b5db47915@openmailbox.org>
 <57280013.30204@riseup.net>
 <e83f62c2189b0c1eabf7a99af989ffb9@openmailbox.org>
From: Mirimir <mirimir@riseup.net>
Message-ID: <57288A74.5080407@riseup.net>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 05:24:36 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <e83f62c2189b0c1eabf7a99af989ffb9@openmailbox.org>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mx1.riseup.net
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Proton Mail and Tutanota - not exactly Tor friendly.
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 05/03/2016 04:29 AM, blobby@openmailbox.org wrote:
> On 2016-05-03 01:34, Mirimir wrote:
>> On 05/02/2016 02:41 PM, blobby@openmailbox.org wrote:
>>> I signed up for Proton Mail only to be asked for SMS validation (just as
>>> Gmail does). Tutanota did not ask for SMS checks, but my account has
>>> been suspended for up to 48 hours while they manually check it (which
>>> doesn't sound too unreasonable since it's free). However, both these
>>> services proclaim they are pro-privacy but they are more or less
>>> anti-Tor.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Tutanota has nuked accounts that I've created via Tor.
> 
> How do you mean "nuked"? Existing accounts just vanish? Or you are never
> allowed to send / receive mail?

I mean that the account is gone the next day.

> Openmailbox (which I am using now) used to allow signups via Tor but now
> any form of Tor or VPN signup is banned.

That's better, in a way :)

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

