Delivery-Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 23:29:15 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1442E1E070B;
	Mon, 30 May 2016 23:29:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19719E0CF1;
	Tue, 31 May 2016 03:29:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A4DE0D04
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 03:29:06 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id gXF9NG2JbCAk for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue, 31 May 2016 03:29:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org (mail2.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.33])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA5ADE0D03
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 03:29:05 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: delayed 566 seconds by postgrey-1.34 at eugeni;
 Tue, 31 May 2016 03:29:05 UTC
Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id 713151057C5; Tue, 31 May 2016 05:19:37 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 s=openmailbox; t=1464664777;
 bh=fcye8quJ7AUlvUzHC0G4QRYiNCUWdudRFnDNC4rgmq4=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=T/b/aHmiP4YjJ/XmVrtsMhxNZI93EJoJwUl8PnnTG8Aq3yBg7rh7YNCOv5pbWnRPH
 oyfZ2FrnAUgWjEiC26wSuomC2+bq+NAk1f26n1pUi5nkWugERvfaGjnl/pKpci/lh9
 SlVYXHGhGCVL/cR5VdIWGEKyrR5YKNb4W68rfogg=
Received: from www.openmailbox.org (unknown [10.91.130.55])
 by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F070104D89
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue, 31 May 2016 05:19:35 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 20:19:35 -0700
From: Spencer <spencerone@openmailbox.org>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <1464657528.493257.623103465.1EE4C107@webmail.messagingengine.com>
References: <1702871614.31614.1464651525212.JavaMail.zimbra@apawc.com.au>
 <1539309998.31648.1464653988743.JavaMail.zimbra@apawc.com.au>
 <512753.f304d0d471761633324c4f52a0a8b5991947c787@popretr.messagingengine.com>
 <20160531010840.GA3189@demorgan>
 <1464657528.493257.623103465.1EE4C107@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Message-ID: <0a5603970f30df22e76eeca2af98af66@openmailbox.org>
X-Sender: spencerone@openmailbox.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.6
Subject: Re: [tor-talk]
 =?utf-8?q?Could_Tor_be_used_for_health_informatics=3F?=
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Hi,

>>> 
>>> Paul Templeton:
>>> peer to peer data exchange system controlled
>>> by the consumer via public keys & .onion addresses.
>>> 

Yay!

>>> 
>>> Practitioner DB would have permissions to
>>> access data based on customer request.
>>> 

Flip this ^

People share health information with practitioners; this can exist in 
many forms, e.g., a push of selected info from patient to practitioner 
that dies after set time.

Think inspector gadget.

Practitioner only gets temporary/limited privileges (:

>> 
>> Seth David Schoen:
>> crypto
>> 

Is needed to protect against intruders, which is outside much of the 
potential user-base context.

However, https is still a use-case to be designed for, as the .onion 
experience needs some more tlc.

Tor Browser and some OpenPGP keys may be enough.

P2P cuts out the potentially malicious middlemen, though.

>> 
>> location anonymity
>> 

Is relevant for domestic issues that overlap with healthcare.

>> 
>> latency
>> 

Can be justified with education as the main trade-off, and is next to 
non-existent in the locations with large population clusters, especially 
here in the .kr (:

> 
> Nathan Freitas:
> operational security outweighs crypto
> 

+1

> 
> https://github.com/n8fr8/talks/blob/master/onion_things/Internet%20of%20Onion%20Things.pdf
> 

Wonderful!

Wordlife,
Spencer





-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

