Delivery-Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 06:03:31 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 180C61E07F3;
	Fri, 27 May 2016 06:03:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4949AE0902;
	Fri, 27 May 2016 10:03:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA3AE08CC
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:03:22 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id FnIQtVRFzhjn for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 27 May 2016 10:03:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org (mail2.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.33])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03959E08BF
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 27 May 2016 10:03:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
 id B177E10473A; Fri, 27 May 2016 12:03:19 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 s=openmailbox; t=1464343399;
 bh=9qurV4+GfUc+jDdCn4BROxczLOx84eVX6VkjRx724xQ=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=FfFlNdMfMQli6OikjC3XgZlM5kfJslBiLoVVcXSe7B2yFKwjvNcMRN3YK0525XMSb
 XJOzCaMsVdZ4yv37BTW89q1XON26bRhMJEzvy+rEj7s0zp4iwcGrdiVnr3m2Kqc7Ay
 rbDb9/OZkBVDMZvhy1glQU7e1TCMri3aTs7bSACE=
Received: from www.openmailbox.org (unknown [10.91.130.51])
 by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2F0105EBE
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 27 May 2016 12:03:18 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 27 May 2016 10:03:18 +0000
From: blobby@openmailbox.org
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti2_T9Dq8-PjDL7iUnDXE1KvWKu24oWm30mZweuvVD3NX2w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <47ec8a6e61d519e22b2e587f664f75f4@openmailbox.org>
 <CAD2Ti2_T9Dq8-PjDL7iUnDXE1KvWKu24oWm30mZweuvVD3NX2w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <69b0dc864382154e297bf70c4da83a69@openmailbox.org>
X-Sender: blobby@openmailbox.org
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.6
Subject: Re: [tor-talk]
 =?utf-8?q?Which_reputable_webmail_providers_function_w?=
 =?utf-8?q?ell_with_Tor=3F?=
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 2016-05-26 04:46, grarpamp wrote:
> On 5/25/16, blobby@openmailbox.org <blobby@openmailbox.org> wrote:
>> Can anyone suggest a reputable webmail provider that is not totally
>> anti-Tor.
> 
> Are you, and other readers of this thread,
> willing to pay anonymously via bitcoin or
> cash in the mail?

I personally have no problem with either method. In fact, I am irritated 
that Tutanota which is supposedly privacy-friendly does not accept 
bitcoin (only cards and PayPal).
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

