Delivery-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 07:38:52 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F30381E0435;
	Wed,  4 May 2016 07:38:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D74083AA46;
	Wed,  4 May 2016 11:38:46 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF7E3AA3C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed,  4 May 2016 11:38:43 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 9Z43bQi6pB-R for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Wed,  4 May 2016 11:38:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C15D73AA31
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed,  4 May 2016 11:38:42 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wm0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id a17so88846870wme.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Wed, 04 May 2016 04:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=googlemail.com; s=20120113;
 h=from:subject:to:references:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
 :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=6NTpBR6Es5iHt1SgXbWdT/2rv5oJR/zniMEBKThPAr8=;
 b=uekB3rnqJhsdGFwWcn6RieTeLhdPSo3h6hqoQ7Zm3gf07BUfxrYxCZv539qpUmfack
 3C9+3WRQKa96eXEIqpB25cc3kSIRFTwqYGd+8tVR+0XWNyxA1WwQFCEeL0cqeMq3Z3gx
 nEdy2FTjyhuTSyJ21XWVT4avVhkCMdbEjG3UpT5d8VwmENGKNnMznR7LS0Iup4kLOU5d
 kl1o+vxLV9i4ehbsVJe4woD8BUO66Gy53XuSVISvvWa+AxbZYABnwy45lbXnI2YzLiM4
 MoUlWgJFWSd73+TcbeVM0vjltxNGWj8hJBJdFztnDugBNMGt1XQPVRWjP5eqqJ8jqBPn
 VMgA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:message-id:date
 :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=6NTpBR6Es5iHt1SgXbWdT/2rv5oJR/zniMEBKThPAr8=;
 b=hfh/KZzVl+qLcrQUsvEP/fFsj/mZyiUD+egyvXxSiPhkwHXg4wlEnEFcmPziFgDu+P
 14okE0i39n2uQwbZceuGMQLmL3vnCIiqprxRFR2VXwb6xfy9RwdqDJqG80M4qtM5zgsD
 T8EnwReBoLlxVPTAa9FjwVqwAxY1kw6ILVnepWUJox1BoGdJQ3NRUc9HpxSUq5w//iZp
 x7/rgbAHkv/2kk2GFHf3U5FE15qowYyQTPRphwy0JqHnH5EkVH7dDy+P5+X0wXDu04+M
 0Ai74/FDtv34/4RtdMLt4NQqTX8vV4DDsTaYiEayZz3c4ISEtXllhCOn2lxm3N81+3JP
 k1dA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FWm0VjCQK0INrd+kBhKAjfh9o0iY6kjIoTMETXmChw69mw4b07p4IwjEQqBNuPmaw==
X-Received: by 10.194.171.194 with SMTP id aw2mr9290673wjc.113.1462361919815; 
 Wed, 04 May 2016 04:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.16.41.91] (195-154-136-42.rev.poneytelecom.eu.
 [195.154.136.42])
 by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id d1sm3699765wjb.47.2016.05.04.04.38.38
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
 Wed, 04 May 2016 04:38:39 -0700 (PDT)
From: aka <akademiker1@googlemail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: aka <akademiker1@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <CAJ8LpWp_yr5KDSHKg0z72FL-s82QYNVaS9Ob5efzftViTqnA=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5729DF29.9020604@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 13:38:17 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/38.7.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAJ8LpWp_yr5KDSHKg0z72FL-s82QYNVaS9Ob5efzftViTqnA=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] MITM attack: How to see Tor Messenger's exit node?
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Nurmi, Juha:
> Hi,
> 
> Yesterday, when I was using Tor Messenger, I detected that Off-the-Record
> Messaging fingerprints are not matching!
> 
> There seems to be a man-in-the-middle attack. The attacker probably is an
> exit node.
> 
> I was comparing public key fingerprints through a secure outside channel.
> 
> Is there a way to see the exit node that Tor messenger is currently using?
> I need this info to test the exit node and report it to Tor Project if it
> seems to perform this man-in-the-middle attack.
> 
> And caution: please all sweet people using Tor Messenger: it's important
> that both parties verify each other and use a secure channel to compare
> fingerprints.
> 
> Best,
> Juha
> 

How can someone mitm Hidden Service connections?
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

