Delivery-Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 22:38:31 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [138.201.14.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A68F71E0CC1;
	Thu, 19 May 2016 22:38:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BBEE0353;
	Fri, 20 May 2016 02:38:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827ADE0350
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 20 May 2016 02:38:21 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id MFYV8pEeQGeI for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 20 May 2016 02:38:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qk0-x241.google.com (mail-qk0-x241.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::241])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18262E034F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 20 May 2016 02:38:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qk0-x241.google.com with SMTP id i7so9404227qkd.1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 19 May 2016 19:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to; bh=EuuvXknq5fDl+/+A9cmQiAcojYNShk3pKqarTwX72DU=;
 b=aaOgWikiZtDXHSJtDV1l8Iz2kNJBhELOwgB9unUMKnjZE2kA1X+stDoodV/YPOHTrs
 YwobecKAh3I4OABHe5UcH6dMsVqSTKKrb+KcYVMPPAXHsjR1T1KmmhVV0wGGXQnJyWIe
 LGREgMfi2OBtpQjm/G6vU9ofQSMfgkUPSuK+xtzikl06rwbRlYEg0HdaZ5Ap2oGuAQpj
 cVWgFzVtN9MpU6ohE1zl76si5tC+bbZDDi5B9Vsq2OonRzPExuXxrw4UfBNtxM+YSSVX
 dO/8qPqct71pzYFzsZ5AtNR6d0hlkvHZv+W2OHFOti2LegzLOqviDq+x9tO/VvCa9iXn
 kyrg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
 :message-id:subject:from:to;
 bh=EuuvXknq5fDl+/+A9cmQiAcojYNShk3pKqarTwX72DU=;
 b=FMD8psHgP1z6uavh6xJ5Z17g7bMJpOw7PYrJ4HhDtTISp1wqaAQrLkhsLbWU4N5GZE
 b2wMEWMRtUPelp33ltV+sM0kjJ90/74aLORYHelXDDXUaLh/d1LnCkeIB+POt6UmG4Ra
 ey3uV8gAbesxec75txucwfyerN62nmL7d6dDRh/vKStYVxBvwbdC42HxkIWdtFQFDfvD
 3qyVk/MF1k17x0840EZydEflLhD1ZeDp6HX645nCQGeaBlYsXucj5eeIg6PyKVthDREE
 idIbMwQBOo9/n1MshEd1kRRXm6OyEOJlloAmhjnW2K8DsU7bY/NrAL2nKWePoD3bX90T
 NmPg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVjZ/i763reCAQ8OVDfooPL4SwEL13jDjSoy6j2w1F4F5NWhVkhznSgVmRX5qA57KeFkAMkLY/pF8Rd/w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.55.24.193 with SMTP id 62mr644227qky.146.1463711894844; Thu,
 19 May 2016 19:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.55.21.19 with HTTP; Thu, 19 May 2016 19:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <a23212e4-ddfa-cd08-78fc-955584b683fc@gmx.com>
References: <F4A8F992-2FBE-4B7D-A20D-C5D00F87C8C5@nrl.navy.mil>
 <56FCAC2F.5030101@cyblings.on.ca> <5734CD97.6040904@cyblings.on.ca>
 <6dca9ad1-53be-7df7-fde8-43105280a920@gmx.com>
 <573D1685.1020602@cyblings.on.ca>
 <CAOsGNSTh8pCEODxDj+YRScJYWfrvUqvFBRP+LvePxOQbJndqDA@mail.gmail.com>
 <a23212e4-ddfa-cd08-78fc-955584b683fc@gmx.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 02:38:14 +0000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: pnPUjYslb3QejCs-mFGx7PbldYA
Message-ID: <CAOsGNSSRbb7UGp4AYkP4QNrH2=BjgKQUvO3Z5DgFFzKDXjCP_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] fwd: FBI Is Pushing Back Against Judge's Order to
 Reveal Tor Browser Exploit
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 5/19/16, Joe Btfsplk <joebtfsplk@gmx.com> wrote:
> bad ideas.  It just struck me as odd that this topic was one of very few
> when most tor-talk subscribers decided to adhere to communication
> silence.

That's potentially inflammatory. I have not chosen to "adhere to
communication silence", I just raised some considerations, well, for
your consideration.

If you have some ideas, legal or technical or otherwise, feel free to
kick off a thread.

One of the problems here is people expecting other people, that is,
someone -other- than themselves, to have specific discussions on
particular matters in a particularly public way.

You can demand that other people perform to your expectations all you
like. But perhaps consider leading by example.

And if you have nothing significant to contribute, then perhaps ask if
you're just wanting to be entertained?

If you have some great legal insight for example, I suggest to you to
consider whether to plaster that across a public mailing list, or
whether to discretely contact those who can make use of it,
potentially to ambush the other side (in this case the FBI/ CIA/ US
govt).

Because frankly, we "little folk" need every bit of advantage we can
possibly get - unless you can personally pony up for some serious
dollar$, we certainly don't have money on our side!!
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

