Delivery-Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 14:23:25 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98CC31E0AF9
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Tue,  5 May 2015 14:23:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6C534FDF;
	Tue,  5 May 2015 18:23:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1DA34FD9
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  5 May 2015 18:23:00 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id wf0k8dxdJHPS for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  5 May 2015 18:23:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (smtp2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.134])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.hushmail.com", Issuer "smtp.hushmail.com" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 451E234F36
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  5 May 2015 18:23:00 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp2.hushmail.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8010CA013B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  5 May 2015 18:22:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.hushmail.com (w2.hushmail.com [65.39.178.46])
 by smtp2.hushmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  5 May 2015 18:22:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by smtp.hushmail.com (Postfix, from userid 99)
 id 6BF60E04DA; Tue,  5 May 2015 18:22:57 +0000 (UTC)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 14:22:57 -0400
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
From: "l.m" <ter.one.leeboi@hush.com>
In-Reply-To: <55490663.3070407@openmailbox.org>
References: <5548D4B4.9040303@rwth-aachen.de>
 <20150505155135.GD7800@moria.seul.org>
 <20150505163624.5D57FE04BF@smtp.hushmail.com>
 <5548F685.2090704@openmailbox.org>
 <20150505170747.61F8BE04BF@smtp.hushmail.com>
 <55490663.3070407@openmailbox.org> 
Message-Id: <20150505182257.6BF60E04DA@smtp.hushmail.com>
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] the privacy of public tor descriptor data (was:
	German University signs up 24 tor relays)
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

How hypocritical. You like to change the subject, again. You and Roger
crossed the line when you didn't accept the operator's response and
leave them alone. They only responded because you *forced* them to. A
relay descriptor is not a person. It's a machine processing digital
blips on a wire. A public descriptor describes a machine. If that
machine prefers to withhold personally identifying information who are
you to even ask why.

A relay is not a person, a descriptor may describe a real-person
relationship iff the operator decides to. It's a good thing Tor
Project doesn't have a code of conduct posted on the website. If it
did I would ask you to take it down.

Of course you have the right to ask questions and make nice graphs
about relays. If those relay make personally linkable information
available it's a choice. A project that promotes privacy and anonymity
is in violation of it's own purpose the moment it tries to force the
operator to identify themselves. I think you did just that. At least
that was the effect.

You've given me much to think about. Thank you.

--leeroy
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

