Delivery-Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 12:58:01 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_ALL,
	DKIM_SIGNED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86C7C1E0384
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Tue,  5 May 2015 12:57:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 166F334F0C;
	Tue,  5 May 2015 16:57:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB5634D2C
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  5 May 2015 16:57:52 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id qmNnjHSkYxkM for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  5 May 2015 16:57:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org (mail2.openmailbox.org [62.4.1.33])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AF0934C4E
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  5 May 2015 16:57:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by mail2.openmailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 574D420395F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Tue,  5 May 2015 18:57:48 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=openmailbox.org;
 h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type
 :in-reply-to:references:subject:subject:mime-version:from:from
 :date:date:message-id:received; s=openmailbox; t=1430845066; bh=
 4iTEuD9XzUzNSP7hbVmR69XqKJr02N8Ri6+pbitx19Q=; b=UxAID3Hl4V5dsVjs
 THyN84sI0xfkAcVSxAuFMU13pZ5jXgkEE/QaP4pjCnMhD8sAeax6gW8CiRHkkFmW
 7Kck635Uf6i2o4hOc2+30ypfX8/RDMR0f53EAfk84kxQKMa1ToHQs6rm+RfzpaDF
 sJUGGVhIc3SmVOl+ykZm8OyV0r4=
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at openmailbox.org
Received: from mail2.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.33])
 by localhost (mail.openmailbox.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026)
 with ESMTP id CiW8mZUxbv_s for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Tue,  5 May 2015 18:57:46 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <5548F685.2090704@openmailbox.org>
Date: Tue, 05 May 2015 16:57:41 +0000
From: nusenu <nusenu@openmailbox.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <5548D4B4.9040303@rwth-aachen.de>
 <20150505155135.GD7800@moria.seul.org>
 <20150505163624.5D57FE04BF@smtp.hushmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150505163624.5D57FE04BF@smtp.hushmail.com>
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] German University signs up 24 tor relays
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512


> I'm not trying to upset anyone but do we really have to stalk every
>  researcher who adds relays? Honestly, does there need to be a
> report on  x-number of relays were added, constituting a spike this
> month to date? I  mean this purely out of respect for tor-related
> research worldwide.

I don't think that someone wondering about an anomaly in relaycount is
being disrespectful. They could have simply provided contact
information via their torrc's ContactInfo.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=Avq8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

