Delivery-Date: Sat, 02 May 2015 02:58:09 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E524A1E0DC0
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Sat,  2 May 2015 02:58:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72316339DE;
	Sat,  2 May 2015 06:58:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893E733573
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  2 May 2015 06:57:57 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id jFHbqV489yG5 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat,  2 May 2015 06:57:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ig0-x229.google.com (mail-ig0-x229.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::229])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CC122B2D8
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat,  2 May 2015 06:57:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by igblo3 with SMTP id lo3so51865063igb.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 01 May 2015 23:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :content-type; bh=0aI+DxhwZxDMJDvE2HHRlUvyK7IMmZVyswL9WOrACb0=;
 b=VU1a3tHHfpYnNOp00KTkA4BeuTaUOGtgiRthhuFe7w0VuoZZj0OodziQdS6goLQyTB
 N3EowehKGSc/+BBfd74mQjkaKHlRisU0ucrgKDLzHdrxPDsv/dCIKfhjP2wm/PtNmQiN
 UoTmAmM0ioX42Cz59pvCMS87M6asjgdwT7nV2aLcoSvXu1SrLePaZujYs+SkezA9svau
 NhDlGIBXLeexCnwpiupqnPWQ8PjCXlwzwJ6kGUfakSYP2w8kugrjhOjebMQa2g7HDtkp
 7W6a245okbqCjVnizLA7/tbwNqTrOZaXeBA3wF+q2LHg3aDC2tpc0TNprEhc8VlqCW/E
 UFFA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.79.130 with SMTP id j2mr1881993igx.17.1430549874559; Fri,
 01 May 2015 23:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.36.51.76 with HTTP; Fri, 1 May 2015 23:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <5542A06F.5020701@gmail.com>
References: <CAHvMVPQtZ3tHWTAMyrsbTZoK_sEUWXf0cKULe==P2aD16MC+ww@mail.gmail.com>
 <554246CB.3000501@riseup.net>
 <CAHvMVPSapRwSqvMgFhV3DWmOxF4knAQ3MwAHK3a3SAYPL9dJuQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <55427887.7020405@riseup.net> <5542817B.70506@gmail.com>
 <55428E14.6020507@riseup.net> <5542A06F.5020701@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 2 May 2015 02:57:54 -0400
Message-ID: <CAD2Ti29kuLUqbRAbY7g-7rX5tSEiD0hFpe2jd-vjQfS3kq3A1A@mail.gmail.com>
From: grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Full integration with bitcoin (suggestion / feature
	request)
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Akater <nuclearspace@gmail.com> wrote:
> quite obvious. My item c) should have been just "you can't share heavy
> media content efficiently with Tor".

You can. But the existing corpus of free mentality users is unwilling
to pay for the network cost required to offset their own network usage.
Like BT over clearnet which is 1:1 network wise, multihop nets cost
per hop too. Tor would cost you about 7x. Freeloaders can't even
comprehend that level of giveback, let alone execute it. Till they do,
yes, as everyone says, BT at scale will suck for and on Tor.

People can look at Freenet and Maidsafe for further distributed
storage / pay / "proof of resource" network semantics.
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

