Delivery-Date: Sun, 31 May 2015 20:22:01 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72D51E0412;
	Sun, 31 May 2015 20:21:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B23F3550C;
	Mon,  1 Jun 2015 00:21:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E5335413
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2015 00:21:50 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id fDjhUi_tsPLh for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Mon,  1 Jun 2015 00:21:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from forward6l.mail.yandex.net (forward6l.mail.yandex.net
 [84.201.143.139])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net",
 Issuer "Certum Level IV CA" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44A4D35333
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2015 00:21:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (smtp13.mail.yandex.net
 [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:801:1::12])
 by forward6l.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 6189C14E0D16
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2015 03:21:12 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from smtp13.mail.yandex.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 0CE03E40512
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Mon,  1 Jun 2015 03:21:11 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from tor-exit1.arbitrary.ch (tor-exit1.arbitrary.ch [78.46.51.124])
 by smtp13.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id
 qZLfoDnBLu-L9mCPKpb; Mon,  1 Jun 2015 03:21:10 +0300
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client certificate not present)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail;
 t=1433118071; bh=WIyoxTvibkXRBUTqIqwQonDTzWEXSiPxb5ZjpXlTvOo=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:
 MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;
 b=rOPyG15JDzu/XbVfdL6268bz5bSgl/aDeZVnFdjNUNoK5zS1dGdW3dCL7rP//nBC2
 iNwyCtZfdnZ4sKmchLKuCNTIRLwh3aphfsgTBhOZFZubCIc1wJaF9g7nvckfUOuUjA
 LjYaIJPkiamKf52TqEy1KgwT+CwvOtyHkjX+9n1Y=
Authentication-Results: smtp13.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 10:20:51 +1000
From: Katya Titov <kattitov@yandex.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Message-ID: <20150601102051.0a0dfe83@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti29eXZdf9o3FUeKs+R9_2-B205jCuPwg8846A0TxWcc3VQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAO7N=i2zN5xsVmrwpUbVCRD2Y9_sFun+paANoUo2Ap=hKdeKqw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD2Ti29eXZdf9o3FUeKs+R9_2-B205jCuPwg8846A0TxWcc3VQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the
 Twilight Web
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

grarpamp:
> Internet access is generally provisioned and billed as... choose
> the max bandwidth you want, pay for it whether you use it or not.
> Therefore if you have idle capacity within your max at some moment,
> you have the bandwidth to dynamically fill it with padding at no
> additional cost. It's not a question of buying more to use as fill,
> it's about intelligently filling what you've already comfortably paid
> for.

There are still many places, including some western first-world
democracies, where Internet access is billed by the byte/KB/MB/GB. I
live in a G20 country outside the US and pay for traffic usage. And
anyone using a mobile connection (maybe shared to their laptop) will
most likely be paying for usage and not bandwidth.

Does anyone know how access is billed in countries with mandatory
Internet filtering such as China, Iran, Syria, etc, and what the impact
of filling would be? How would such have impacted, e.g., the Arab
Spring?

-- 
kat
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

