Delivery-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 23:28:03 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,
	T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06F331E141E;
	Fri, 29 May 2015 23:28:01 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0763494B;
	Sat, 30 May 2015 03:27:55 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC2663466F
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 30 May 2015 03:27:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id 6empsZE4EN0s for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sat, 30 May 2015 03:27:51 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from nm50-vm6.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
 (nm50-vm6.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.115.237])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98CB33445B
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sat, 30 May 2015 03:27:51 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048;
 t=1432956468; bh=AMxo80Ali7oiQ1WULPFpxcNkicz3H5MKGSgv//SBOq0=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject;
 b=AUswu4FBx5jkBAecdglTz99TdSUfWuBQd+lIezdYbrizkqZM5nj6P88V8MjJfz4GMtKJD/zYh4vBIjIcMEGhH65tyOori7ucdPXjJvetobEYwo2yvGREI0OSeJlPvUS8EgW6gCRTCa0E/xJsjXmdf0FmDlnSBMqqFpv4qeeRebE7H9KXw+45e4Gaysk6jIIYjVB4dAYFdri/463gIGjoh+5f9I6MtoL1xHm8TI4Fwboxh/hFHF0luMH3cP6aNbNp9A+zlFGTqZeHBO7zc6gAinh8Cv+8uZYRiDLkCVrN+n3wX5KqGxdsm5vyaKW9HqhtDhwY1XJAG9p0SuzxAikt9Q==
Received: from [66.196.81.170] by nm50.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
 30 May 2015 03:27:48 -0000
Received: from [98.139.211.161] by tm16.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
 30 May 2015 03:27:48 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp218.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP;
 30 May 2015 03:27:48 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 708279.10521.bm@smtp218.mail.bf1.yahoo.com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG: vXio8jIVM1mJr7b3cL_eVVb88oJW7X_Y.GqHM8g94scz5y5
 AX61chidjja_Q64.v.fCVz.kkHLOuLkhS6_bmtFxmkdRGrqqFTI6.KqlPYA9
 FdPpDEFcu9KbPzeRs_pc72MRAcaFbH7TtZRtwjqV8tPtc2ObF5kzLUrSUgNA
 ubLpRINL3iVSwzVvThCSd_tTHyIGGvcTR2nHamO5bzspFQb44qyx9thXaA1.
 J.n8PaF9sQV91kXO6JTFIZQvXLNDQAoKDoKHV238jI4LGig3H.e6uLjrLyjy
 gyZo7vJ1Djuv6RCY0mb1WxjiOUQyc8gucQUUTteaA8XqAKeZ_5kXEeka3Ka1
 ihdjRsq4GMKX.JZPxjnm34LTC__c2GeF5mNUZKUxMTUtzoOk_iX5uEEX78nv
 zKHuS.dthxxzhM5pOVJN4T8Ddr3VNmPprIT6YqAHuMDMyjQ6wPCbs7viEyYA
 .UQNPO.s4VUjUhizDs6x3J5bwtrMwyHYnyyJ_KMzHdDzwg8NoBg_0V1hf69Q
 i719DmbzgOolJNm30mhtcdeLRc.u.WGauaCMN
X-Yahoo-SMTP: 2naF56eswBDuYDy9JW2WHf3pncV9
Message-ID: <55692E2A.7060601@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 23:27:38 -0400
From: Jonathan Wilkes <jancsika@yahoo.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
References: <CAD2Ti2-qdymrnM-nHqP2sVBYP=notY6sW54dQ1to-KTbkTEY4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <555E2BFC.6000709@rawbw.com> <20150526233633.GA1790@lo.psyced.org>
 <5565198C.2000701@yahoo.com> <55651A22.4020501@confidantmail.org>
 <5568E0B0.3020105@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <5568E0B0.3020105@yahoo.com>
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Mailpile SMTorP [ref: nexgen P2P email]
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 05/29/2015 05:57 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>
[...]
> (Confidential to cryptography list lurkers: IMO we have plenty of Ben 
> Lauries
> at this point, and could use a lot more Hal Finneys. :)

It just occurred to me how obscure that sentence is.  Let me explain...

When Satoshi (or whoever) released the initial version of Bitcoin, 
he/she/they
posted to the Crypto List[1].  Hal Finney responded with posts that 
showed he
a) read the Bitcoin whitepaper, b) read some of the code that Satoshi 
linked, and
c) ran the Bitcoin daemon to see how it worked. Ben Laurie responded
by posting a link to a paper on the general topic of "proof-of-work" 
(like Hashcash,
upon which Bitcoin is based) and why he believed it cannot work.

While a general critique of Hashcash probably seemed appropriate at the
time, it completely overlooked central features of Bitcoin's design.  
There's a
kind of bikeshedding in those early threads, presumably because it's 
easier to
discuss the failures of spam prevention than it is read and understand novel
code in C++.  (But even a casual glance at the whitepaper elucidates 
Bitcoin's
bootstrapping mechanism, which AFAICT had never been employed or
written about before the Bitcoin whitepaper was posted.)

Given the influx of post-Snowden FLOSS privacy/security apps, I think 
the only
way forward is to follow Finney's lead and strive for a kind of "proof of
comprehension" in our discussions[2].  Otherwise we're all just picking 
our favorite
slide from the Snowden leaks to reject 100% of the apps out of hand.  (And
then adding our own efforts to the pile.)

-Jonathan

[1] 
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=cryptography@metzdowd.com&q=from:%22Satoshi+Nakamoto%22

[2] There were other respondents on that list who critiqued the design
but also showed clear evidence that they had read the paper.

>
> -Jonathan

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

