Delivery-Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 01:46:09 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1CA61E13ED;
	Fri, 29 May 2015 01:46:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CC9355B1;
	Fri, 29 May 2015 05:46:02 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EF5335510
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 29 May 2015 05:45:59 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id vONCCI2-u81A for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 29 May 2015 05:45:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-ob0-x235.google.com (mail-ob0-x235.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::235])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 085AD354F8
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 29 May 2015 05:45:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by obbnx5 with SMTP id nx5so49577654obb.0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Thu, 28 May 2015 22:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:content-type;
 bh=tcc559RPWUK3ZccHeXw5gXTBART0QIPDzcj2kP6/gps=;
 b=F4/qFMVcvnZn3TVVrl5Zll6sHpBmMt7/T1L8W1arDcwdu0e/RKjtx88DRd3SmCDYTL
 rKRDyjx2X4e/0iNdGDG8/5UWtFT7CJcUe94zaLnX4m2T2pi9F3ky4WYEjRlbt0rvIg3l
 oXdeNXLIDqlUTa9Q3OmTEUa0Rb3RtvHlttIK7oIz8E6u2EAlbVF2af1ZFo54c+94IUYo
 zWSRKaN9WgSAgZVLozW/FiSffA4Zp3rWS5v7Z5EoRn4F1r47AtC5dBSauvUuwUw1ln8j
 TbybmWqYQEPbmt2RjHXS+KHDLeEZ+e0UgGm0xhQRZ0ClgIMtybSmaoU+yOek+VJDz2HP
 3h5A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.84.143 with SMTP id i137mr5267566oib.114.1432878356516; 
 Thu, 28 May 2015 22:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.182.121.198 with HTTP; Thu, 28 May 2015 22:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAD2Ti2-MXfOcSCT8OLOHBEJC0UYFqe7QpU6wn178bRTpP2kdWw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAMm+Lwg5K2VudO_c3s=P0G0_MCN3aCOeuZ_FAaKRTYLKMzaVvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD2Ti28xG7j6DzULAJNqdEVE30HLktO_MC8w0vRGOH4uUODz5w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAOsGNSRyU5eYefsw7QQZ4srJBZAwq+cPA-HLy0D1R=43vDJsoQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAD2Ti2-MXfOcSCT8OLOHBEJC0UYFqe7QpU6wn178bRTpP2kdWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 15:45:56 +1000
X-Google-Sender-Auth: IpClUo1G7UN2K-tp0y3s7_i4hzc
Message-ID: <CAOsGNST_gTdh6F3t_4yLnXxhBcXHMfvdiwCGo+tCDqS+KnVXvA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the
 Twilight Web
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On 5/29/15, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Zenaan Harkness <zen@freedbms.net> wrote:
>> On 5/28/15, grarpamp <grarpamp@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> to be taken other than filling your unused capacity with fill traffic.
>>> No network to date appears to be developing or using that defense.
>>
>> I thought that was the main differentiator for I2P (as compared with
>> TOR)??
>
> Nope. As above.

Just finished reading a bunch of I2P pages, and can confirm what you
say - I'm guessing I read this section, and forgot the "but not yet
implemented" bit:
"Various mixing strategies at the tunnel level (e.g. create a tunnel
that will handle 500 messages / minute, where the endpoint will inject
dummy messages if there are insufficient messages, etc) "
https://geti2p.net/en/comparison/tor
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

