Delivery-Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 17:23:35 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE3C31E0CB2
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Fri, 22 May 2015 17:23:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653153585F;
	Fri, 22 May 2015 21:23:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D91357A0
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 22 May 2015 21:23:27 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id CidKcU0Mw5zX for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Fri, 22 May 2015 21:23:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBBA135676
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 22 May 2015 21:23:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by labbd9 with SMTP id bd9so20613891lab.2
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Fri, 22 May 2015 14:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:content-type;
 bh=2fYfStzX9+hxPv3bzpYxbyBMnRiNqrrZllLFd/MbJ4U=;
 b=aToczQHJiATYLuW9ziL5TeccFZ0szVfUeEiJM2fCyvc1S78uv34AizoFBHsguubjbE
 /Q0y1W11YXHC0hVABQq8Hqoow85kvPrP3GraoWXwyAVmEfhiKO5YCKEwGkpxgpNsqtaW
 wPji531MqHGZo80FSm+XE/ajjp9y3dHbLJJwjWw6Vins+J3YKGduwZfEJjNKvWIWt1/N
 JojRJFC8K8INdQCdPAWEDcnPzP5b/K7YxF6rhAJ0o4foWitDVmWL9h9zJ4dg1KfxyfNL
 x5eju6oncxPjjpFZlckkRY/hb5aCJJ9zTbY2q7/giLFpjdS/7krcB6PtePjrfTFIdRd1
 h7LA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.181.34 with SMTP id dt2mr7933201lac.84.1432329803703;
 Fri, 22 May 2015 14:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.27.6 with HTTP; Fri, 22 May 2015 14:23:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <555F9ACE.4020707@rawbw.com>
References: <555F9ACE.4020707@rawbw.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 14:23:23 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: FSXwPt2Q8WccGfOIJ0tCtJYPpqI
Message-ID: <CAMTdTS8v6JTLvgf3ZaVOtp-FLdpcHK+BkVEEHSw-XZk3nYwR4A@mail.gmail.com>
From: benjamin barber <barberb@barberb.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.15
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] New Astoria Tor client is said to be better than
	plain Tor
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

Here is a link to the paper. http://arxiv.org/pdf/1505.05173.pdf  however I
dont think there was any source released.

On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Yuri <yuri@rawbw.com> wrote:

> This story
> http://www.dailydot.com/politics/tor-astoria-timing-attack-client/ has
> been injected into all possible news streams today.
>
> Is there any merit to it?
>
> Yuri
> --
> tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

