Delivery-Date: Sun, 03 May 2015 18:58:24 -0400
Return-Path: <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on moria.seul.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Original-To: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-To: archiver@seul.org
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (eugeni.torproject.org [38.229.72.13])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by khazad-dum.seul.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E9D61E050E
	for <archiver@seul.org>; Sun,  3 May 2015 18:58:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915EA34C3A;
	Sun,  3 May 2015 22:58:18 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14DE334C37
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  3 May 2015 22:58:16 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at 
Received: from eugeni.torproject.org ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (eugeni.torproject.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
 with ESMTP id RxYio3L69Jxc for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>;
 Sun,  3 May 2015 22:58:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qg0-x232.google.com (mail-qg0-x232.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (not verified))
 by eugeni.torproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1FEA34C33
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun,  3 May 2015 22:58:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by qgfi89 with SMTP id i89so58818638qgf.1
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>; Sun, 03 May 2015 15:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=0/qhQ0OqnUQoiQ4mwZeRbtOsMvYGwhCiqRBzS/LgT3I=;
 b=FOEoNghCC9D8I1gAw5RJc4X6D6JNulJszK6dLxc9zA1XIcPLDHp2KNC5oqFPc+edgB
 s+UNiQ0+9/4PNhMk5KnVJECjjYely3zb2jSrgQ6ULmlpPfYPcniWfZUZXQLSVDa812Fe
 fm/4BP8G1okOApkggkSeY2csCo/k0jg3Fhx22p5/aasbfsNaV9AGmTkrmi9OYeXQWchh
 QzSzpwX1Clna5SUCxZjDZNN1VUpYUZ8Zt+SnOsoffV0MBKpvQSy57ZNyHlGTEkhec2CC
 pPXFFr9I8LUfK6Rxk/86aRwWcfBHUtzbZS/CRl61j3YZHDrl7StMbr+n8WyB+lifyx3O
 mO8w==
X-Received: by 10.140.232.3 with SMTP id d3mr25090838qhc.46.1430693893514;
 Sun, 03 May 2015 15:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([186.153.86.63])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id d11sm8621872qgd.31.2015.05.03.15.58.12
 for <tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Sun, 03 May 2015 15:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5546a805.8b1e8c0a.132b.ffffafe9@mx.google.com>
Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 20:02:48 -0300
From: Juan <juan.g71@gmail.com>
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
In-Reply-To: <CAJVRA1S2Um0D=oM3bMf0RonowRDi41FVac=jprwuq9z+Cb8vwA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <5545929B.10805@riseup.net>
 <CAMTdTS9Jo4RYpQX+esro4pHO2zAG6gYTJWDsxsLeNaQ6A+026w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJVRA1S3tTX=hMDMrefvAWOT1Bi18zH_ztBGh8G+S_7hwodDEw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMTdTS-_BhHXb76-_US8gx6YdH2dpPmh4-D6utiBQghjaULrnA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJVRA1SSz4rMw=S8yqyHkuakVyZbzAxLQFj_fAwG3xUCcSm90w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMTdTS9J65QtAPQtK+TAzQ4O=sPF9jxsRBhgZ6xX8svjC6_AHQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJVRA1S2Um0D=oM3bMf0RonowRDi41FVac=jprwuq9z+Cb8vwA@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.10 (GTK+ 2.24.10; i486-slitaz-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tor-talk] Meeting Snowden in Princeton
X-BeenThere: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
List-Id: "all discussion about theory, design,
 and development of Onion Routing" <tor-talk.lists.torproject.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/>
List-Post: <mailto:tor-talk@lists.torproject.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk>, 
 <mailto:tor-talk-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org
Sender: "tor-talk" <tor-talk-bounces@lists.torproject.org>

On Sun, 3 May 2015 02:02:44 -0700
coderman <coderman@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 5/3/15, benjamin barber <barberb@barberb.com> wrote:
> > Except that TOR says they're going to help LEO with stop cyber
> > criminals according to briefings with UK parliament.
> 
> what part of "Will never compromise Tor" do you not understand?


	LMAO!  What part of 'secret laws' and US military nazis you
	don't understand? 

	Plus, why on earth should anybody trust whatever you post from
	your anonymous address? 



> educating law enforcement does not equate to capitulating to calls for
> backdoors or weaknesses.


	bla bla bla



> 
> when the control port flaw was disclosed, a patch was committed within
> 8 hours - while Tor people were on the road at a security conference.
> this is a record turn-around for any defect i have been involved with.
> in terms of technical measures for security, Tor has a great track
> record - even compared to projects with ten times their resources.
> 
> 
> 
> > Thats not to mean that Tor is a government honeypot but its not
> > secure enough, but if the government makes tor popular people will
> > not be persuaded to more effective models.
> 
> Tor _is_ the most effective model deployed. there are a great many
> ideas about making it even better, and i don't see how Tor being
> popular precludes making it better.
> 
> take a look at the datagram Tor related research to see just how
> difficult / complicated some of these problems are.
>  (userspace stacks, congestion controls, padding and reordering,
> etc... )
> 
> pro-active security posture, prompt resolutions to serious security
> issues, attentive to new research and actively engaged with
> educational and professional organizations.
> 
> any of these aspects speak well of Tor itself and the Tor Project
> around it.
> 
> perhaps disagreement based in technical merit should have been
> requested. do you have any?
> 
> 
> best regards,

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk

